Book Review: Alex Haley, The Storyteller Who Really Did Mean Well

ALEX HALEY COVER

Alex Haley: And the Books That Changed a Nation.
Robert J. Norrell.
St. Martin’s Press.
272 pp. $31.50.

 

The story, and stories, of Alexander Murray Palmer Haley (1921-1992) challenge belief in more ways than one. He was the great djeli (griot) who wrote Malcolm’s story down before connecting Africa and America in America’s popular culture and the charlatan story-weaver who made up a phony African past and attached it to his family. He lived as a near-worshipped figure but, after his death, he had been re-labeled a semi-disgrace—a hustler who lied, plagiarized and died in financial ruin, his materials and memories, authentic and otherwise, auctioned off into a faded national memory.

Robert J. Norrell, a white University of Tennessee professor, thinks Haley got the bummest of historical raps. So he makes clear in this biography, billed as the first full one of the 20th century writing legend, that he will take his time to go through the public, long-standing criticisms about Haley, and square it with facts. Norrell believes that the most successful Black author in the 20th century was a victim of celebrity, a man who committed misdemeanors but was mandatorily sentenced in the American sphere.

The main question marks surrounding Haley’s tarnished halo are tackled directly. Did he plagiarize from Margaret Walker’s “Jubilee” and Harold Courlander’s “The African?” Not necessarily—almost, but not quite. Not using the strictest note-taking methods, he settled out of court because he wanted the issue to go away. Did he make up the story of Kunta Kinte and Gambia? He had a story and found people in Gambia who decided to adopt it for tourism’s sake. Doubleday decided to market the tale as nonfiction, and Haley didn’t protest. Was he really the opportunist and quasi-FBI stooge that Manning Marable portrays him in “A Life of Reinvention,” Marable’s controversial Malcolm X biography? Haley, a struggling freelancer, was on the hunt for big journalistic and nonfiction game, yes, but he genuinely admired Malcolm and wanted his people to see themselves as descendants of Africans. Is he a liar and a faker? He is a man who told a story too good to be true too many times, and wound up believing it. He had his hustle tight—until it unraveled fully after his death, when the facts were publicly checked.

To his biographer, Alex Haley was a proud Black man writing in the big leagues during the 1960s and 1970s, a time when white novelists were becoming luminaries by melding fiction and nonfiction in their magazine articles and books. Novelists back then were trying to re-create journalism and nonfiction as art. (As Norrell points out that the Malcolm X autobiography was “the creation of its subject’s life, not a factual recounting of it. That can be said of all autobiographies.”) Inspired by what was happening in America’s literary scene, he took what he knew and created a kind of Black Power and African consciousness that was palatable to white audiences. He was responsible for the creation of timeless Black heroes that countered the worst of the Blaxploitation film era, endless reruns of Tarzan films, and stereotypical Black network television sitcoms: “Kunta was the second great hero Haley had created on the page,” writes Norrell. “Kunta and Malcolm X both were examples of fierce, independent, and manly characters, and together they formed a new and cherished archetype for Black Americans—and indeed for many whites.”  He was a man who stood in the center ring of America’s white centennial and pushed for new Black/African images, unbound by the stigma of slavery.

So yes, Haley was a pioneer on how to fake-it-until-you-make it philosophy, but his fakery is showered in good intentions as well as opportunistic ones. Norrell doesn’t remove Haley’s devil’s horns, but instead places him and his by-all-accounts impactful work in a positive purgatory. The biographer documents a Black man he believes should be celebrated for writing about Black men who forever changed Black people from Black Americans to African-Americans. With Malcolm’s autobiography, Haley pencils in a winding map of Malcolm’s life and thoughts. And with “Roots,” he gives Black America a shining myth of their very own. There are worse ways to be remembered, and Norrell encourages the (re-)formation of this affirmative recollection.

Back Home Listening To Imhotep Gary Byrd On WBAI (And Now, Simulcast On WLIB And WBLS) Again…..

….makes me think of the first time I paid attention to his voice 30 years ago, which was on this song on a cassette tape and the above PSA that I saw on New York local television.

I guess the PSA came as a result of the below.

My Root Story On Howard University And WHUT-TV……

…..is here.

(Yes, I re-posted this great hour of Black public affairs programming!)

Melki On Black Movies That Are Not Part Of The Blaxploitation Era

trick baby title

Well, Melki, you seem to have a lot of free time on your hands, so tell me what’s going on with you.

Watching the movie “Trick Baby” on Bounce TV and amazed how much better the so-called Blaxploitation films were in terms of addressing racism than an overwhelming majority of the black films of today. How much better the dialogue is and understanding of how the system of white supremacy is standing on our neck squeezing the literal blood out of our communities. When I watch Shaft, SuperFly, The Mack and tons of lesser known movies from the 70’s, I see human beings completely aware of their struggle and what they are struggling against and who. Most of all, you see that they are struggling to be accepted as human beings. They are not proving this to themselves but to the rest of the world. I recently saw Claudine again with James Earl Jones and Diahann Carroll and a young Lawrence Hilton Jacobs, we all remember from “Welcome Back Kotter,” and it was refreshing in that their humanity shined against the oppression they faced. They refused to bow down or scrape or question their value as a human being simply to survive. When we look at a majority of our movies over the past 30 years, they present many of the same struggles with a major, major exemption. They portray the vivid and beautiful struggle minus the structural oppression that subconsciously takes the lens off the true culprits that create and maintain so-called ghettos, Hoods, physical and mental. They don’t address the systematic oppression under white supremacy – they instead tend to focus on environment and the prejudices of the few. In Cornbread Earl and Me, the failure of Black Lives to matter and overt retaliation for presumption of our humanity was clear and front center, without transforming Negus into their often and always incorrectly used “worse enemy.” We shifted from Blaxploitation to Blockploitation.

Maybe Hollywood learned something and made it a point to no longer allow these types of films to exist for fear that if this generation reconnects the dots between art and protest, real change is possible? Or simply maybe American materialism has won over previous generations to the extent that they no longer saw the connection between art and protest except for a few exemptions such as Spike Lee, Haile Gerima and the conscious hiphop movement? Or just maybe these films exist but are banished to some artistic prison never to be shared among the masses? Regardless, there remains hope. Hope that we see in the massive mobilization my young people and students over issues like police brutality. More than likely, this generation gets it and more than likely we’ll have art that once again not only fights the power, but kicks the power’s ass! Overstand! 

You act like you have discovered a hidden gold deposit.

Man, I had netflix and now have Amazon video and there are so so many movies from that era that are dope that most of the current generation including ours have never heard of. And the majority of them had a message about fighting the system. Some ain’t made so great but what moves me most about them is the dialogue. I don’t feel that way listening to whoever is writing these films nowadays except for a few ocassions. They talked to each other like Negus was intelligent and could go deep, not like they were 2 dimensional characters. And maybe that is it right on the head – a lot of the people writing and making the films had enough real experiences to talk. This is the way I plan to write my movies. Growing up in the projects, I never got the feeling that Negus was stupid. They was the smartest mawfukas I ever knew. A lot of movies nowadays go for the confused look as if a Negus don’t understand the why or hows of their situation, which I guess is dramatic if you want to stroll someone along because your plot is weak? You find yourself staring at the movie like why didn’t he say something? Like damn, if he actually responded intelligently in that scene maybe a few more intelligent scenes would have to be written and that might fuck up the cookie cutter – bad hollywood films for dummies step by step process! lol There are some great people out there, so I don’t want to lump everyone in together…this is an attack on Hollywood and reasons why we’ve got to at least find a way to create our own studios and creative space, which some say the ATL might actually become once all that residual money from reality tv, strip clubs and hiphop starts growing dividends for folks’ children! lol