Tag Archives: Star Trek
#TheView: #LeVarBurton Reflects On Impact Of #Roots, #ReadingRainbow, And #StarTrek #StarTrekTNG
#WhoCulture: The 10 Biggest Mistakes Of The #DoctorWho #Disney Era (aka #DisneyWho)
Since there is no #DoctorWhoChristmasSpecial….Wrote this in this #YouTube video’s Comments section in November and scheduled it here for today (X-Mas)
Right on time!!!
• I watched #MaryPoppins over the (American) Thanksgiving, and I was like, “Ahh….” I’m stuck on No. 9. The Doctor is supposed to be a hero scientist who acts like Poppins, not the opposite. I love mythology, but #DoctorWho is not a purely mythological show–yes, “full-time fantasy mode.” I mean, #Lux (one of my favorites!) had a #MaryPoppins segment! That’s what I recognized!
• I also agree with No. 10. #NcutiGatwa didn’t spend his entire life wanting to be The Doctor. A young and ambitious man, it’s clear he would have been OK if he had gone with his other request to his agent, #WillyWonka. His becoming a supporting character in his own show was not a problem to me as long as the writing was excellent (#73Yards).
• The re/bi-generation issue is not a big one for me. Agreed that the Rani thing only made sense because it gave her someone with whom to chat. Yeah, lack of a plan…bad mysteries (ex: snow? Why?)
• #RubySunday and #BelindaChandra had no time to develop. Ruby’s family was better developed.
• #Disney didn’t get it and just wanted it to work on its own as a legacy program.
• Fourteenth should have started with #Boom. Like many a #DisneyWho episode, it felt like a bad and discarded #SarahJaneAdventures idea. Once you do episodes like #VincentandtheDoctor and #HellBent / #HeavenSent, you can’t go back and emphasize the goofy parts of say, #TheEndofTheWorld.
• My verdict: too much freedom and confidence are bad for an artist, particularly one wanting to spend a huge budget and get a new audience while trying to serve an old one. But art does require risk, and they were indeed taken. In this case, as was this past season of #StarTrekStrangeNewWorlds, it was too much of, in the words of the Purple One, the immortal #Prince: “Let’s go crazy/Let’s get nuts…”
#DoctorWho #WhoCulture #EllieLittlechild
P.S. DECEMBER 23rd TWEET:
Todd Steven Burroughs
@ToddStevenBurr1
TheWarBetweenTheLandAndTheSea is no #DoctorWhoSeason4 or #DoctorWhoSeason9, but it has made the often-painful excesses of #DisneyWho go down much smoother. Totally worth it! #DoctorWho #WhoCulture
*************
AI Analysis:
The shift from “NuWho” (2005–2022) to “Disney Who” (2023–present, under RTD2) represents a pivot toward higher-budget fantasy, emotional intensity, and international audience appeal. While both eras under Russell T Davies share similar DNA—focusing on modern-day companions and high-stakes finales—the Disney era introduces a more “fairy tale” tone, increased focus on emotional performance, and a glossy aesthetic.
Elements of a “Nu Who” Story (2005–2022)
- Sci-Fi/Horror Focus: Often emphasizes “harder” science fiction elements or psychological horror (“Midnight”), with a grittier, more “scrappy” feel.
- The Time War Context: Early NuWho was heavily defined by the emotional weight of being the last of the Time Lords.
- Companion-Driven Emotion: Focused on the domestic life and personal growth of companions (Rose, Donna, Amy, Clara) and their “modern 21st-century girl/boy” perspective.
- “Runaround” Pacing: Fast-paced, often 45-minute episodes that “swing for the fences,” cramming maximum ideas into a single installment.
- Humanity-Focused Adventures: Many stories take place on modern-day Earth or involve humanity’s future, frequently featuring Davies’ signature mix of humor and kitchen-sink drama.
- The “Know-It-All” Doctor: The Doctor is often immediately aware of threats, treating them with a mix of awe and fear.
Elements of a “Disney Who” Story (2023–Present)
- Fantasy and Magic Over Sci-Fi: The second RTD era has shifted from pure science fiction to embrace “fantasy” and “superstition,” including characters like the Toymaker or goblins.
- Glossy, High-Budget Aesthetics: Stories are visually enhanced by increased production budgets, allowing for cinematic VFX and “magical” realism (e.g., Wild Blue Yonder).
- Emotional & Physical Display: The Doctor (Ncuti Gatwa) often exhibits more overt emotions, with scenes focused on crying, hugging, and high-intensity dramatic acting.
- “Musical” or Theatrical Elements: Inclusion of non-traditional elements like musical numbers (“The Devil’s Chord”) and a more theatrical tone.
- Mystery Box Storytelling: A very deliberate, season-long mystery (e.g., Ruby Sunday’s origins) designed to keep viewers engaged across streaming platforms.
- “Soft Reboot” Approach: Designed to be accessible to a global audience, treating the new era as a fresh starting point (“The Church on Ruby Road”).
- Thematic Focus on Love and Betrayal: While still featuring classic monsters, stories often center on the emotional, personal, and thematic, rather than just the physical threat.
Key Differences Summary
| Feature | NuWho (2005-2022) | Disney Who (2023-) |
|---|---|---|
| Genre | Sci-Fi / Sci-Horror | Fantasy / Magical Realism |
| Vibe | “Scrappy” / Gritty | “Glossy” / Cinematic |
| Doctor | Stoic to Melodramatic | Highly Emotional/Expressive |
| Conflict | Time War / Physical Peril | Magical / Emotional Stakes |
| Episodes | 45 min, High-paced | 45-60 min, Experimental |
***************
JANUARY 24th, 2026 UPDATE:
MARCH 25th UPDATE:
MAY 31st UPDATE:
JUNE 16th UPDATE:
#StarTrek #Starfleet #StarfleetAcademy #StarTrekStarfleetAcademy | First Look Teaser | #Paramount+ #ParamountPlus
*************
Some Comments About “Star Trek: Picard” @ The Halfway Point Of Season 3, The Final Season

If the last five episodes are as incredible as these first five, this one season of this one streaming show will have made up for:
- Every bad episode of TOS;
- Every bad episode of ST:TAS;
- Every bad episode of TNG (yes, even the race/ethnic stereotyping and overt racism of Seasons 1 and 2);
- Every bad episode of DS9 (were there bad episodes of that? 🙂 );
- Every bad episode of Voyager (and I love the fact that there are not many of those 🙂 ),
- Every bad Trek movie (maybe even including the new ones, depending on how powerful this particular story and series ends!) and
- Every misstep of streaming Nu Trek, animated and live-action (including Picard Season Two)
This is an amazing time to love this franchise! Today is a good day to live 🙂
[UPDATE AFTER SEEING FINALE ON 4/20/23: The finale might have been the weakest. With the amount of time spent, the showrunners are determined to set up Star Trek: Legacy–something that technically doesn’t exist (yet)! I can’t believe the Trek people allowed the showrunners so much setup for nothing. There was less setup for a new movie the Trek folks have already announced! The story as a whole is almost the GOAT, but perhaps time will push this to an A+.]
*****
A Related Aside: Between this and what’s going on with Star Wars streaming shows, it’s beginning to be understood that good writing fixes everything–even bad movie sequels and prequels. The Star Wars streaming showrunners are creating world-building that’s so well done [LINK ADDED 4/20/23] it’s actually showing the greatness of the content of the prequels and sequels. An example of re-evaluating and changing your long-held view of something based on something else new that puts the old in a new context, a la the maxim, “If you change the way you look at things, what you look at changes.”
Book Mini-Review: Galactic Improvisation
So Say We All: The Complete, Uncensored, Unauthorized History of Battlestar Galactica.
Mark A. Altman & Edward Gross.
Tor Books. 718 pp., $27.99.
No, it wasn’t the record-breaking-rated, universally-loved show it is now seen as, almost ten years after it ended. No, it wasn’t unconditionally loved and cherished by its network–until the awards and critical acclaim came in, and the showrunners announced that the fourth season would be its last. From its beginnings 40 years ago as an often ill-fated attempt to bring the visual and spiritual power of Star Wars to ABC primetime screens every week, to its let’s-kill-every-rule-Star-Trek-ever-had-and-hold-up-a-mirror 21st century Sci-Fi (now SyFy) Channel revival during the post-911/War on Terror years, Battlestar Galactica was almost always an acquired taste, a pleasant, almost-mainstream discovery. But how powerful the concoction! Altman and Gross, who interview as many cast and crew members that a human mind can absorb on a given page, take us step by step through the mythology as it developed, the last three words being key; perhaps the biggest shock of the book–practically its thru line–is how much of the new version was editorially done on the fly, and how its showrunners, Ronald D. Moore and the series’ often-unsung hero, David Eick, trusted its writers to fly Galactica–a complex series about race/identity and its connection to current politics, ancient Earth history and world religion–to a powerful, albeit controversial to many, end. What a great way for Altman and Gross to end a trilogy (four books, technically) of fan-favorites–Star Trek, then Buffy/Angel, and now BSG. These kind of books, especially with its oral history formats, take the rabid deep into the rabbit(-ears) whole, allowing the reader to see into the experience, and stay there. For a BSG fan, this is essential, since the series presented much but purposely answered little.

