The *NEW* Syndicated BET: The "E" Stands For "Enterprise"

So Black Enterprise finally has made the leap into Tee Vee. (I’m sure someone at Essence with a long memory is going, “So what? We had a nationally syndicated show years ago.”) ‘Member it? Nope? Okay, moving on, then…….. 🙂

Buying “America’s Black Forum” and re-shaping it can only been seen as a good thing. The program’s only claim to fame in its years on broadcast life-support was that it was a national mainstream platform for Armstrong Williams and Niger Innis to parry their conservative views with crusading—and graying—Black liberals Julian Bond and Deborah Mathis. *YAWN*. It’ll be interesting to see if Ed Gordon and Co. will create something that will have a purpose beyond being an early-morning FCC requirement.

Peter's Farewell Deals With Blacks And AIDS

Damn, I miss Peter Jennings. He helmed what was then the only (relatively-free) bullshit-free newscast. I still watch what’s now called “World News With Charles Gibson” still out of loyalty. We’ll see how long this loyalty lasts when I get the option of checking out kick-ass Katie (sans those extraordinary legs :)) on CBS at the same Bat-time.

Peter’s last project, which ABC finished up for him, is a prime-time “special” (the dreaded “D” word was banished from network news divisions a LONG TIME AGO) on African-Americans and AIDS. It’s scheduled to air on Thursday at 10 p.m. Those of us who constantly complain about how the white boys of the internationally-known alphabet either don’t cover our issues, or mis-cover them when they do, should be by their Tee Vees or Tee-Vos.

Saying It's A Satire Makes Sexism Okay? (UPDATE)

Here’s the statement from Lisa Fager of Industry Ears.

Viacom’s MTV continues to justify the exploitation of African American women by hiding behind words like “satire” and “parody”.  The animated portrayal of two African American women scurrying on all fours with leashes around their necks, defecating on a pet shop floor goes far beyond the pale of acceptability.  It is not art; it is an assault.  The justification given by stating that one of the animated dogs points out his disgust by saying, “I find this a bit degrading and I’m a dog” does not eliminate the harm.Actually, the point is countered by the other dog who states, “Are you joking?  What’s cooler than a two-legger who treats other two-leggers like four-leggers?”  This statement emphasizes and reinforces – as tolerable behavior – the treatment of black women as dogs.

The fact that Viacom’s MTV chose to air this program on Saturday afternoons just in time for children to tune in after their morning dose of cartoons, demonstrates their complete disregard for the impact these images have on furthering both racist and misogynistic attitudes.  “Where My Dogs At?” is symptomatic of what appears to be a programming strategy that is aimed at attracting an audience by portraying African American women and communities in the most degrading, confrontational manner imaginable. These images are harmful in our society and promote the racist stereotypes of black women as nothing better than dogs.  The impact on children and young people is even more relevant because internalization of these images can inhibit the development of a healthy self-concept.  It is indeed our right and our duty to teach our children that such negative depictions are not acceptable. There is no place in our society for images that repeatedly and continually cast African Americans in images that are reminiscent of the darkest hours of this nation’s past.

We call on responsible corporate citizens to condemn the airing of this program and any program that propagates harmful, racist stereotypes and misogynistic images.  We think this is wrong and we respectfully ask the President of MTV, Christina Norman, as well as other Viacom executives to
rethink the manner in which they depict African Americans and women.  We urge all concerned individuals and organizations to email Christina Norman ( Christina.Norman@mtv.com ) and their local cable providers to demand the removal of “Where My Dogs At?” and any other program that exploits African Americans and women. 

About Industry Ears

Established in 2004, Industry Ears (IE) is a new generation think-tank focused on media’s impact on children and communities of color. IE is dedicated to addressing and finding solutions to negative and harmful content through media education, research, advocacy, public policy and continuous dialogue with industry stakeholders.

Saying It's A Satire Makes Sexism Okay?

I’m going to try to get Lisa Fager’s full statement on this, so stay tuned. 

MTV2 faces decisions on ‘degrading’ cartoon
Episode of ‘Where My Dogs At?’ showed black women leashed, on all fours
 

MSNBC News Services

Updated: 12:19 a.m. ET Aug 10, 2006

The MTV2 network said it had not decided whether it will ever again air a cartoon criticized as offensive for depicting women being led around on leashes.

It’s also not certain whether the series, “Where My Dogs At?” will come back for a second season, spokesman Jeff Castaneda said Wednesday. Its first season ended during the last week of July.

One episode, aired in the early afternoon, featured an appearance by a cartoon Snoop Dogg accompanied by two women in neck collars and chains. MTV2 said the episode was a satire of an actual Snoop appearance where women were in collars and chains.

“We certainly do not condone Snoop’s actions and the goal was to take aim at that incident for its insensitivity and outrageousness,” Castaneda said. “Even one of the dogs, a main character on the show, states, ‘I find that degrading and I am a dog.”’

The cartoon has drawn fire from several prominent African Americans who call the episode degrading.

Critics say MTV2 showed especially poor judgment because the weekly animated program, “Where My Dogs At?”, appeals to young teens and airs at an hour, 12:30 p.m. on Saturdays, when many children are watching television.

The half-hour show lampoons real-life celebrities and pop culture as seen through the eyes of two wise-cracking stray dogs — Woofie and Buddy — voiced by comedians Tracy Morgan and Jeffrey Ross, respectively.

A statement released this week by the Viacom Inc.-owned cable network, whose president, Christina Norman, is black, defended the episode in question as social satire.

In it, a look-alike of rap star Snoop Dogg strolls into a pet shop with two bikini-clad black women on leashes. They hunch over on all fours and scratch themselves as he orders one of them to “hand me my latte.” At the end of the segment, the Snoopathon Dogg Esquire character dons a rubber glove to clean up excrement left on the floor by one of the women.

MTV2 said the “Woofie Loves Snoop” episode first aired on July 1.

Several prominent blacks, including New York Daily News columnist Stanley Crouch, condemned the segment as misogynist, racist and crude, and they questioned the sincerity of MTV’s contention that it was satirizing the outlandish behavior of a real-life rapper.

“Where’s the context in that?” said Lisa Fager, president and co-founder of Industry Ears, a consortium of broadcast industry professionals who monitor and critique media content.

Crouch suggested in a column this week that the “Where My Dogs At?” segment was an extension of dehumanizing images contained in gangsta rap videos aired by MTV and projected ”around the world as ’real’ black culture.”

Payne Brown, a high-ranking executive at cable giant Comcast Corp., said he lodged a personal complaint in an e-mail to Norman but found her response, essentially the same as the network’s press statement, to be “unsatisfying.”

“Clearly, it goes far beyond the pale of anything that remotely could be considered acceptable,” he said of the episode, stressing that he was not speaking for Comcast. “This is just me as an African-American father, husband and son.”

The first season of the show, which carries a rating advising that parents may find its material unsuitable for children under age 14, drew a cumulative audience of 17.2 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Two Self-Explanatory NYT Articles

So let’s get to ’em:

————-

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/03/arts/television/03leve.html?ex=1155355200&en=a423c22ac06adf87&ei=5070

August 3, 2006

Agony of New Orleans, Through Spike Lee’s Eyes

NEW ORLEANS — From the beginning Spike Lee knew that Hurricane Katrina was a story he had to tell. Watching the first television images of floating bodies and of desperate people, mostly black, stranded on rooftops, he quickly realized he was witnessing a major historical moment. As those moments kept coming, he spent almost a year capturing the hurricane’s sorrowful consequences for a four-hour documentary, “When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts,” to be shown on HBO this month.     

The film, which Mr. Lee directed and produced, comes 20 years after the August 1986 debut of his first hit, “She’s Gotta Have It,” about Nola Darling, a Brooklyn graphic artist, and her three lovers. The provocative films that followed (“Do the Right Thing,” “Jungle Fever,” “Malcolm X,” among others), with their searing cultural critiques, cemented Mr. Lee’s reputation as his generation’s pioneering black filmmaker. This year he had a commercial and critical success with “Inside Man,” about a bank heist.

Like him or not, Mr. Lee, 49, is an artist many people feel they know. People, black and white, approached him and the “Levees” crew here, he said, imploring: “Tell the story. Tell the story.” “It becomes like an obligation we have,” he said.

Mr. Lee’s reputation helped get his camera crew into the city’s water-soaked homes, he said. It allowed him to stretch out a complex story, with themes of race, class and politics that, he said, have too often been sensationalized or rendered in sound bites. He received permission, for example, from Kimberly Polk to film the funeral of her 5-year-old daughter, Sarena Polk, swept away when the waters ravaged the Lower Ninth Ward. “She came to me in a dream,” Ms. Polk says in the film. “She said, ‘Mama, I’m falling.’ ”

“Levees” opens with the Louis Armstrong song “Do You Know What It Means to Miss New Orleans?” and offers black-and-white images of the city’s Southern-with-a-twist past — Mardi Gras, Confederate flags — interspersed with scenes of children airlifted from demolished houses, a door marked “dead body inside.”

This gumbo of a film lingers on the politics of disaster response, the science of levees and storms, the city’s Creolized culture, the stories of loss. Many faces are familiar: politicians like C. Ray Nagin, the city’s mayor, and Kathleen Blanco, the governor of Louisiana; celebrities like Harry Belafonte, Kanye West, the Rev. Al Sharpton and Sean Penn; and the native son and trumpeter Wynton Marsalis, who talks about New Orleans as the birthplace of jazz. “It’s like somebody violating your mama,” Mr. Marsalis says of the flooding.

Mr. Lee said he intended most of the “Levee” stories to come from the ordinary people who endured the Superdome’s makeshift shelter or long searches for loved ones. So “Levees” includes many people like Phyllis Montana LeBlanc, depressed and outraged after her family was evacuated to different places around the country and she waited four months for a government trailer. “Not just the levees broke,” she says in the film. “The spirit broke.”

And there’s Paris Ervin, a University of New Orleans student, who fled Hurricane Katrina but left behind his mother, Mary Johnell Morant. Months later, after their home was officially searched and marked empty, the police found Ms. Morant’s remains in the kitchen, under a refrigerator. It took two more months for the coroner’s office to identify her officially and release the body.

As a kind of thank-you to the many residents like Mr. Ervin, the first half of “Levees” will be first shown free on Aug. 16 to 10,000 people at the New Orleans Arena. HBO is to show the first two hours of “Levees” on Aug. 21 at 9 p.m., the last two on Aug. 22 at 9 p.m. It will be shown in its entirety at 8 p.m. on Aug. 29, the anniversary of the hurricane, one of the country’s worst natural disasters.

The critics and audience will have the final say on whether “Levees” is the thorough examination that Mr. Lee intends. His views are clear. “What happened in New Orleans was a criminal act,” he said, a tragic backhanded slap to poor, black or politically insignificant people. “The levees were a Band-Aid here and a Band-Aid there. In the famous statement of Malcolm X, the chickens came home to roost. Somebody needs to go to jail.”

Douglas Brinkley, the author of “The Great Deluge,” a book about Hurricane Katrina said: “When I heard Spike Lee was coming down, I felt grateful. I thought the media perspective — while good — still showed that a lot wasn’t being asked.” Mr. Lee is “grappling with the larger question of why so many African-Americans distrust government,” said Mr. Brinkley, a professor of history at Tulane University, who appears in the film.

Just as Michael Apted’s “7 Up,” documentary series followed a group of people, filmed first as children, Mr. Lee said he hopes to return to the people profiled in “Levees.”

One 90-degree Saturday, some of those interviewed gathered in a big meeting room at the Courtyard Marriott Hotel, not far from the Convention Center. Each person was photographed within a frame, intended to convey the idea that each interview is a portrait.

“It’s really just a mood,” Cliff Charles, the cinematographer on “Levees,” said of what he was trying to capture in the various portraits.

“Levees” has no voice-over narration and is stitched together by the witnesses and commentators. Sam Pollard, the producer and supervising editor, said they had made 30 or so versions of the documentary, wading through hours of film for the moments and the elements that best tell the story.

Mr. Pollard, who like Mr. Charles is black, has worked with Mr. Lee on two other documentaries, “4 Little Girls,” about the girls killed in the bombing of a black church in Birmingham in 1963, and “Jim Brown: All American,” about the former pro football star. Mr. Pollard said Mr. Lee came up with the film’s title last year, before they started shooting.

On the set Mr. Lee asked all the questions from a typed list. (“You have to say the question in the answer,” he said to those he interviewed. “Don’t look at me, keep looking at the lenses.”)

The interview lineup on that day in May included Joseph Bruno, a lawyer, talking about the complexities of flood insurance, among other topics; the musician Terence Blanchard (who also did the score for the film); Calvin Mackie, a mechanical engineer; Brian Thevenot and Trymaine Lee (who had Mr. Lee autograph his videos), reporters from The New Orleans Times-Picayune; and Mr. Brinkley.

Mr. Lee’s direction was terse, although he is more soft-spoken than his public image suggests. He told Mr. Mackie, whose father had lung cancer and was supposed to start chemotherapy the day the hurricane hit: “Talk about your father and stepmother. Say their names too.”

Mr. Mackie, 38, a professor of engineering at Tulane, was mourning their deaths. His 43-year-old stepmother Linda Emery Mackie’s breast cancer had metastasized in the weeks after the hurricane. His 63-year-old father Willie Mackie’s cancer treatment was delayed for six weeks, his health records lost. They died days apart in March.

“I hope that the documentary opens America’s eyes to how we continue to struggle here,” Mr. Mackie, who is black, said after his on-camera interview. “No matter how you feel about Spike, and I don’t like all his movies, people know about his integrity and his unrelenting commitment to African-American people, to tell our stories. You talk about street credibility, well, he has a cultural credibility.”

“Levees” started out as a two-hour, $1 million film. HBO executives looking for a Hurricane Katrina project snapped it up. Mr. Lee and his crew were able to get into New Orleans after Thanksgiving, Mr. Lee said, and he quickly realized that he needed two more hours and $1 million more to give the story a full airing. He got it.

Sheila Nevins, the film’s executive producer and the president of the documentary and family division at HBO, said “Levees” was an easy sell, at both prices.

“I realized this would be the film of record,” she said. “When Spike interviews a forgotten American whose kid floated away in the water, he lets them raise up their poetry. They’re able to express to him what they’re not able to express to anyone else.”

With all those hours of conversations and interviews, he certainly ended up with themes that went beyond the floodwaters, Mr. Lee said.

“Politics. Ethics. Morals,” he said, when asked what Katrina and in turn “Levees” was really about. “This is about what this country is really going to be.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/business/media/01adco.html?ex=1155355200&en=db5893b8614a6f82&ei=5070

August 1, 2006

An Image Popular in Films Raises Some Eyebrows in Ads

At 200 pounds plus — most of that pure attitude — she is hard to miss.     

Her onscreen presence takes on many variations, but she is easily recognizable by a few defining traits. Other than her size, she is almost always black. She typically finds herself in an exchange that is either confrontational or embarrassing. And her best line is often little more than a sassy “Mmmm hmmm.”

This caricature, playing on stereotypes of heavy black women as boisterous and sometimes aggressive, has been showing up for some time in stand-up comedy routines and in movies like “Big Momma’s House’’ and “Diary of a Mad Black Woman.’’ Often, the pieces are produced by directors and writers who are black themselves.

With black creators giving more acceptability to the image, it is now starting to appear more often in television commercials as well. Most recently some variation of this character has appeared in commercials for Dairy Queen, Universal Studios and Captain Morgan rum.

But despite the popularity of such characters among blacks, the use of the image of big black women as the target of so many jokes is troublesome to some marketers and media scholars.

“It is perpetuating a stereotype that black females are strong, aggressive, controlling people,’’ said Tommy E. Whittler, a marketing professor at DePaul University. “I don’t think you want to do that.’’

To be sure, sassy overweight black women appear to represent only a small fraction of the African-American actresses who appear in commercials. Marketers have made strides in recent years toward making advertisements with a more diverse cast of characters.

Blacks regularly appear in commercials selling products as diverse as toothpaste, credit cards and erectile dysfunction medication. Indeed, according to several academic studies, over the last 15 years the number of blacks appearing in commercials has been roughly proportional to their share of the American population, about 14 percent.

“Over the years it’s evolved,’’ said Fay Ferguson, co-chief executive of Burrell Communications, an advertising agency that specializes in marketing toward black consumers. “We’ve come a long way in how we see black women in advertising.’’

Stereotypical portrayals of blacks in commercials have drawn criticism from civil rights groups for decades. Some of the earliest and most iconic examples of blacks in advertising — Rastus the Cream of Wheat chef, Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben — showed blacks in subservient roles that recalled the days of slavery.

Those images have been toned down over the years (Aunt Jemima’s red bandanna, for example, was replaced with pearl earrings and a lace collar in 1989) and are no longer as overtly stereotypical as they once were. And now there are many examples of blacks presented in middle-class settings and engaged in mainstream activities.

To some, the freer use of overweight black women in comic situations suggests a welcome change that reflects a broader acceptability of blacks in the media. But others find the recurring use of the image a return to a disturbing past.

And some say these images may serve to exacerbate misunderstanding between whites and blacks.

“Not only are we being given images of who we are supposed to be, but others are also formulating their images of us based on that,” said Marilyn Kern Foxworth, an author and marketing expert who studies how blacks are portrayed in advertising. “People have already determined who we are and how we’re going to react in certain situations.”

The heavy black female makes one of her latest appearances in a commercial for the Dairy Queen Blizzard. In the spot, a man boarding an airplane sets his ice cream shake down so he can load his bag into an overhead compartment. As he reaches up, another passenger on the plane starts eating the Blizzard. Seeing this, the first man lets go of his bag so he can reclaim his Blizzard and inadvertently drops his luggage on another passenger’s head.

That unlucky passenger happens to be an overweight black woman who lets out an irritated gasp that reminds all the passengers around her who not to mess with.

Rick Cusato, executive vice president for Grey Worldwide, the firm that wrote the campaign for Dairy Queen, said the script was not written with a black actress in mind.

“We basically cast the funniest person,” he said. “We didn’t specifically cast for a black woman. We said, ‘Wow, she’s really funny.’ And she happened to be black.”

Another new Dairy Queen commercial features a similar character — played by the same actress — working as an airport security screener. When a man tries to walk through a metal detector eating a Dairy Queen burger, her eyes dart disapprovingly downward at him. Then she barks, “Uh, uh. Get on!” directing him to walk through again.

Michael Keller, Dairy Queen’s chief brand officer, said the company considered actors of all sizes and races before making a decision. “We looked at male body builders, really big tall women. We looked at just about everybody we could,” he said. “She projected an image that was everything we wanted it to be. This is just a strong woman being herself.” He added that the company had not received any complaints about the ads being racially insensitive. But to some these images are troubling.

“It’s not an accident that she’s African-American and heavy,” said Howard Buford, founder and chief executive of Prime Access, an advertising agency that creates commercials marketed toward minority audiences. “There’s certainly a long heritage of large African-American women who are kind of sassy and feisty and humorously angry. There’s a sense that this whole value system is O.K. again.”

Large black actresses have had recurring roles in commercials over the years, and often are cast in roles where their aggressiveness is a defining trait. The heavy black spokeswoman for Pine Sol was one of the first to embrace the role. Her aggression was aimed at household dirt, however, not people. In a recent commercial for Captain Morgan rum, a large black woman berates her man for playing dominoes and making her late.

In one recent Twix commercial, a full-figured black woman asks her boyfriend if her pants make her rear end look big. As the camera focuses on her plump backside (exaggerated by the camera for effect), the man stuffs his face with a Twix bar and mumbles an indecipherable answer.

Pleased with his response, the woman walks away. She is not shown being aggressive or loud, but the commercial leaves the impression that if the man had given the wrong answer, she might have erupted.

A series of Universal Studios commercials star a heavy black woman who is accompanying her children on a Jurassic Park ride. Frightened by the ride, she roars and buries the heads of her two young children in her bosom.

Black advertising executives have noticed the stereotype.

“There’s an image out there of black women being boisterous, overbearing, controlling and extremely aggressive in their behavior,” said Carol H. Williams, who runs her own advertising firm in Oakland, Calif., that specializes in marketing toward blacks. “I really don’t know why that stereotype is laughed at.”

Some have trouble with the new commercial images in part because they are being created by white writers.

“There are images of African-Americans created for white people by white people and there are images of African-Americans created for African-Americans,’’ Mr. Buford said. “And there’s a big difference.”

The lack of diversity on Madison Avenue has been a long-standing issue. In fact, the New York City Commission on Human Rights is investigating the hiring practices of advertising agencies in the city and is looking at how they have approached employing blacks.

Jannette L. Dates, dean of the communications school at Howard University, said that while whites and blacks could watch the same portrayal of a large black woman on television and laugh, they are laughing for different reasons.

Some whites, Ms. Dates said, may laugh thinking, “Wow, she’s so ridiculous. My people aren’t like that.” She added: “They wouldn’t consciously feel that way. But there is something going on subconsciously because that’s what advertising is all about. They’re trying to tap into some feeling, some emotion, some psychological hang-up.”

Blacks, meanwhile, might laugh because they can identify with the character, Ms. Dates said. “It’s for both the people who want to snicker and say, ‘See, that’s how they are.’ And for people to say, ‘There’s one of us.’ ”

Orlando Patterson, a sociology professor at Harvard, amplified that point. “To the black audience, this may be, ‘You do your thing, sister,’ ” Professor Patterson said. “The white audience is laughing with her. Then they go back to reality, and they laugh at her.”

But Liz Gumbinner, a creative director at David and Goliath, the agency that developed the Universal campaign, said the broad appeal of the commercials was proof they were not insensitively playing on racial stereotypes.

Noting that a black woman in a recent David and Goliath focus group spoke up about how much she liked the Universal ads, Ms. Gumbinner said: “I wonder if sometimes when you have somebody that is less conventional, they become the most memorable. We use a lot of bald men, and it’s not like we have it out for bald men.”

Ms. Gumbinner and Mr. Cusato of Grey Advertising, however, said no black writers were involved in either of their campaigns.

As is typically the case with racial stereotypes, who is laughing and why is complex and potentially inflammatory. Black actors and comedians have profited handsomely from creating bumptious female characters on TV and in movies, raising the issue of whether they, too, are perpetuating the stereotypes that many find offensive.

Tyler Perry, the filmmaker and actor, created a series of plays and movies, including the huge hit “Diary of a Mad Black Woman,” in which the main character Mable (Madea) Simmons is a no-nonsense overweight matriarch. Mo’Nique, a full-figured comedian, has built a routine on being outlandish, brash and, at times, downright crude.

Mr. Buford, of Prime Access, said part of what makes the comedy of Mr. Perry and Mo’Nique acceptable is that it is written from a personal experience common to many blacks.

“Authenticity makes a lot of difference,” he said. “It’s authenticity born of having lived that life versus having been cast in that role.”

Black Media Self-Determination, Exhibit A

Good news is always welcomed here. So here’s some.

————-

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20060803/lead/lead4.html
 

Region tunes in to CaribVision
 

published: Thursday | August 3, 2006

BRIDGETOWN, Barbados, CMC: The Caribbean Community’s (CARICOM) lead Prime Minister for the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME), Owen Arthur, has fully embraced CaribVision, describing it as the region’s very “own” television station.
 

Delivering the keynote address at Tuesday’s official launch of the channel by the Caribbean Media Corporation (CMC), Arthur complained about cultural penetration and foreign domination of the media messages and the industry as a whole in the Caribbean.

“We might indeed be one people but we surely are better informed about the affairs of others and know more about others elsewhere in the world than we know about our own right here in the Caribbean,” he said.

The Barbados Prime Minister noted the Caribbean enjoyed a rich cultural heritage but further lamented that “our senses have by and large been shielded from enjoying this rich heritage, while we have been inundated by cultural imports, which sadly, have largely promoted gratuitous violence, amoral lifestyles, a profound disregard for good literature, among their most imposing effects.”
 

Caribbean artistes

He also complained about exploitation of Caribbean artistes by foreign media entities in pursuit of profit.

It was in this context that he welcomed the launch of CaribVision, which will be beamed directly from the Caribbean to the people of the region and the Caribbean Diaspora.

CMC’s Chairman Darcy Boyce noted that demand for the Caribbean product internationally was growing and that more Caribbean companies were becoming pan-Caribbean in orientation.

“Clearly, a media house with reach throughout the Caribbean is now necessary. Beyond that, such a media house must be able to carry its product into the international markets where there is an interest in and demand for Caribbean media content. No other media house is creating a Caribbean media space in the same way as CaribVision,” Boyce said.
 

CaribVision facts

CaribVision is a cooperative venture between CMC, regional and U.S. partners.

These include CBC of Barbados; TV6 of Trinidad and Tobago; CVM, TVJ and CPTC of Jamaica; ICRT, Cuba; ZNS, Bahamas; SoundView Broadcasting of New York and many independent producers around the region.

The channel is currently aired in Antigua, Anguilla, Barbados, Cayman Islands, Dominica, St. Eustatius, U.S. Virgin Islands, the British Virgin Islands and St Vincent and the Grenadines.

"Eyes" Forward, Albeit Somewhat Blinded

So I read the small blurb in The Crisis magazine the other day that “Eyes On The Prize” will return to Public Tee Vee this fall. I was elated, until I read the (original?) Boston Globe story.

Excerpted out of order from Catherine Foster’s May 26, 2006 Globe account:

The clearance rights for the astounding amount of material, which had originally been negotiated to be used for varying periods of time by Blackside, gradually expired.

It took four or five years to raise $915,000 for research, rights clearance, and post-production costs, said Sandra Forman, Blackside attorney and director of the “Eyes on the Prize” Renewal Project.

So Blackside had indeed raised the $900,000 or so ( the total cost of any five Diddy parties, right?) for broadcast rights, but not the rights to allow the series to be sold again on DVD.

*SIGH*

Oh, yeah, and I gotta point out that:

The first six hours took 10 years to fund and produce.

I have the greatest respect for our ancestor Henry Hampton and the fact that he used up half his life to create Black documentaries and get them on American screens. It must be said, however, that “Eyes On The Prize” is a racially, politically and ideologically conservative, PBS- and Ford Foundation-approved version of the Civil Rights and Black Power movements. I’ve always seen it as akin to a documentary series on the Jewish Holocaust that was partially produced and (under)written by a modern-day unified German government. “Eyes I,” from 1987, shows a part of the Black Freedom Movement as something called the Civil Rights Movement—a time, according to “Eyes,” in which small groups of whites and Blacks lovingly came together to nonviolently expand American democracy.

However, its national airing—particularly “Eyes II”‘s 1990 debut, showing the Black Panther Party and Attica to a generation (read: me :)) who had never seen anything like that level of resistance—was one of the biggest mistakes this system ever made. Back then. When many of us we were wearing African medallions and trying to read books on our history and culture. When Mandela released himself from a South African prison. When Spike Lee was still angry and BET still had its first newscast and its first version of “Teen Summit,” and when those shows were followed in subsequent years by SEVERAL talk programs/newsmagazines (“For Black Men Only,” “Screen Scene,” “Conservations with Ed Gordon,” “The Color Of Money”) . I’m just sayin’. 🙂

The tragedy of “Eyes” is that Black resistance against a system of oppression is somehow never seen. But I guess we can’t expect foundations created from the spoils of white supremacy, capitalism and patriarchy to actually pay to show that to our lil’ chillins, can we? Those innocent tykes might actually start to ask some questions about their society………. 🙂 Or even worse, ask questions about what WE have done, or not done, to further this Movement.

Time to get out the DVD recorders before the screen blacks out again.

BET To Air African Historical Animated Series

As a cartoon geek, a tangential student of African history and soon-to-be student of African mythology, I couldn’t be happier about this news :):

Click here for the story

LOS ANGELES – Vin Diesel will take on the Roman Empire in a new BET Networks cartoon series about military leader Hannibal.
Diesel will voice the noted general, and his One Race Prods. company is producing the show, titled Hannibal the Conqueror.

The half-hour series will span the life of Hannibal, from his tutelage as a warrior under his father, Hamilcar Barca, to his scaling of the Alps with an army of elephants, and his invasion of Italy.

Diesel, who also is in development on a feature film centering on Hannibal, called the series “groundbreaking.”

“I knew that BET would be the perfect place to launch an animated series that celebrates an African mythology and a general that is probably the most notorious general of all time,” Diesel said. “It’s a story that resonates with everyone–it truly is a celebration of a general who is able to bring everyone together with the common cause to essentially fight for freedom.”

The network has ordered six episodes, and is planning to air it in a primetime slot in fall 2007.

“This isn’t a Saturday morning show–we want to be able to show a lot more of the drama and action that you expect to see in primetime,” BET senior vp animation Denys Cowan said.

I thought my action cartoon-fiending days were over when Cartoon Network’s “Justice League Unlimited” ended this spring. Ancient history told properly from an African-centered mythological perspective…..it’s about damn time! Now, if BET Enterainment President Reginald Hudlin can only get a cartoon about Marvel Comics’ Black Panther green-lit, we’re in business! It shouldn’t be too hard for him to be the liaison, since he writes the character for the monthly comic.