
Cynthia Tucker for her opinion writing.

And the Special Citation for Our Ancestor John Coltrane? Gee, talk about taking your time…… LOL!

Cynthia Tucker for her opinion writing.

And the Special Citation for Our Ancestor John Coltrane? Gee, talk about taking your time…… LOL!

……Gene Roberts, for “The Race Beat.”

You can listen here for more about the book. My opinion of books of this genre is here.
 

Was that an actual flash of anger I saw in Gwen Ifill’s eyes last night? Did I hear a momentary change in tone as she delivered her commentary at the end of PBS’ “Washington Week”?
Well, it’s ABOUT. DAMN. TIME, GWEN.
My great peeve about Black MSM pundits is a simple one. When they criticize whites who diss them every day in one form or another, it’s gotta be “objective” criticism. When they criticize Blacks—especially the now-aging Dashiki Class after the latter calls them Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimas—they actually return fire like honest-to-gosh opinion writers, not worried at all about offending the targets or those they claim to represent. Guess it’s because the former actually represent REAL power, including the power to get their Black asses canned and rushing to Kinko’s to photocopy their HBCU News Writing syllabi. 🙂
Which is what made Ifill’s slight inflection so interesting. The Mask slipped off a little. Instead of doing what she’s made into an art form—showing the White Boys She Can Play Their Game As Well Or Better, etc.—she actually stepped outside of her smiling Washington insider posture and showed her audience that she was not happy. Not with Imus, and not with her enabling colleagues. She even quoted from her New York Times Op-Ed, which defended the honor of her sisters. Wow……. 🙂
Yeah, Gwen, put ’em on notice: There is no Stork Club anymore! LOL! And just one more thing: Show that tone again sometime, PLEASE???
(JULY 15 ADDENDUM: Man, she’s called even more people out today on “Meet The Press”, including host Russert! I really hope to see more of this Gwen Ifill in the future.)

Meanwhile, on “Inside Washington,” Newsweek‘s Evan Thomas—who I KNOW got at least one email this past week asking not to appear on Imus’ show—just told the truth: he was on there to sell books, so he ignored all of Imus’ antics. He sounded sad—the way white liberals always do when they are (a)shamed and have to acknowledge white privledge of any amount. Since he defended Imus in the email response he sent back, this remorse just makes him, in this instance, just another Powerful White Boy who’s full of……..
Finally, speaking of white boys, Howard Kurtz is supposed to devote the whole hour of tomorrow’s “Reliable Sources” to the I-Mess. A media critic friend pointed out to me that Kurtz ignored the topic last Sunday. So There Ya Go. 🙂
CODA: As usual, “On The Media” is strong. But I’m not surprised; as a regular listener, I know Brooke and Bob never seem to care who they offend. I guess that shows that either they’re deep in The Club that Mike Wallace talked about with Brooke, or they really don’t care about being celebrity authors or television pundits.
Â
From April Silver, by April Silver.
Invisible Women?
A Black Woman’s Response to Don Imus Most Recent Sexist-Racist Remarks
(April 9, 2007) The recent media frenzy around national radio and talk show host Don Imus’ sexist-racist comments about the women’s basketball team at Rutgers University (New Brunswick) is one more item in the evidence column of how women are regarded by men. With a natural fluidity, Imus casually referred to the Rutgers players as nappy-headed hos.
Two days later (Friday, April 5), he read a statement that was supposed to be an apology. Today, he extended his apology by saying “I’m a good person. I said a bad thing.â€Â
When I first read the news, “What the hell…?†was all I could muster. Blood rushed. My heart ached and I lamented for Black women. Then I went back to doing what I was doing. It was surreal to not be surprised or outraged by his comments, but I wasn’t. From what I know about Imus, which is not much, he’s a veteran offender of everybody (except White men, I suppose). That men, be they Black or White, see women through idealized or dehumanized lenses, is not new. That Imus, in particular, would make ignorant comments, is status quo. So “shock jocks†are not shocking any longer.Â
Perhaps the hardening began as I was growing up in Los Angeles in the 1980’s. LAPD’s death grip of choice for Black people was the choke-hold. That was one of my first understandings that some white people with authority had it in for Black people. And some non-authorative white people too! In 1998, James Byrd of Jasper, Texas was murdered by three racist white men. They hitched him to the back of their truck and dragged him for 3 miles. It’s believed that Byrd was alive for some of the time he was being dragged. A fast forward to recent times would bypass countless other racist murders and hate crimes, but it would bring one up to speed with Michael Richards’ rant about niggas at the Laugh Factory, as well as the NYPD murder of Sean Bell in New York, among other maddening things in this so-called civilized society.Â
No doubt my hardening is also cemented by the current all-time high sexist state of affairs of today’s hip hop. Grown Black men, aided by white affluent male financiers, over-saturate our multi-media landscapes with sex, sex, and more mega sex fantasies – which do an excellent job of animalizing women or only presenting them, as Dr. Beverly Guy-Sheftall so eloquently states in Byron Hurt’s groundbreaking documentary “Hip Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes,”  as “objects to be fucked.â€Â
 Â
But Black sexist men, whether they care to admit it or not, take their cues from White sexist men. They reinforce each other and form unspoken alliances – all at our expense. But oppressed anybodies take their cues from dominating forces. It’s universal, scientific, and is part of the reason why women accommodate injustices from men.
Some Good Men
“If men had to go through what ya’ll go through today, the movement would have been started a long time ago. We couldn’t endure all that you put up with.†A male friend’s comments one afternoon as we discussed a few sacrifices that women make in order to please men. Our rituals around hair, make up, and body, mostly, not exclusively, have their origins in our desire to indulge men. Another friend, who is also regarded as an anti-sexist male, told me that his activist work is largely inspired by a woman in his life who was killed at the hands of an abusive husband. “When I first started challenging men about our sexist behavior, I was very nervous.†He confided. “I never knew what I was going to say, let alone how it was going to be received. But I would conjure up Tara (not the woman’s real name) and she would “talk†to me. She would guide me in taking up her cause. I felt like I was defending her and other abused women. I was glad to do it and I became less and less nervous over time.â€Â I know plenty men who understand that the discussions about gender must involve men. I’m baffled that I know many men wise enough to stand this ground. They are a rare breed and I don’t exactly how they arrived at this place in their lives so securely…there’s nothing in our society that nurtures such thinking.
Â
Â
![]()
The thinking that gets upheld in this country is the normal Imus, he and his bashing kind—Black and White (Howard Stern, Star, formerly of Hot 97 and Power 105 in New York and others). More often than not, these men get rewarded by default. Their sexist-racist views are not eradicated, but are suspended, as if in mid-air, for the world to behold and publicly criticize…for a time. They have jobs to come back to…somewhere in the entertainment field, no matter how irresponsible and violating the comments. So cozy is the old-boy network, Imus doesn’t have to pause from his job right away…even his suspension is held in suspension. There have been meetings, marches, and mea culpas for a few days now. Imus’ firing has been called for by Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton, Brian Monroe, president of the National Association of Black Journalists, and many others. Despite my hardening to these sex-race fests that pop up on the national scene every few months, I am still jolted by a glaring factor.Â
The Mule of the World
The exclusion of Black women weighing in on this controversy is thunderous. In the immediate aftermath of the comment, I never got the impression that “the media†was even remotely interested in feedback from the young Black women hit, or from any other Black woman for that matter. The respondent faces of this controversy have been predominately male. In fact, the one woman who was given a national platform this night on CNN’s Paula Zahn was a white woman — an enlightened, well-spoken, and progressive one — but a white woman nonetheless.
The by-passing of Black women is the kind of obnoxious, oppressive exclusion that “the media,†and the white affluent men who own it, have embraced for decades. Black women don’t immediately come to mind in the search for analysts or independent thinkers, even when the subject is them. Black woman organizations are not who Imus sat down with when he offered a so-called apology. He bowed toward men first. Rev. Sharpton is the logical go-to person in a national controversy such as this, for he has consistently stood up for the disenfranchised. It is not logical or acceptable, however, that Imus by-passed the women of the Rutgers basketball team and Black women leaders in making his first, second, and subsequent statements about the matter. Another item in the evidence column that Black women can be the ‘ho, the bitch, or even the reason for the gathering, but we are not to be engaged intelligently. It is not even assumed, by the so-called powers that be, that we can think, speak, or defend ourselves. If we take a stance at all, it must be after the men do their bidding.
Zora Neale Hurston’s Nanny (of Their Eyes Are Watching God) said that the Black woman is the mule of the world. That would be an ascent in some eyes.Amongst Black women, perhaps even we assume that White men just have too much power for our own good. Perhaps we also assume that if our transgressors are Black men, then well…maybe there’s no dignity or progress to be made if we dare challenge them. That’s just too disloyal. I disagree.
There is a time, a place, and the power of reason to stand up for ourselves, even amongst family. Part of my work, ironically, is in the media field (and, up until two months ago, I co-hosted an African American talk show on a prominent national cable TV show). In my work, I have come across narrow-minded decision-makers whose job it is to book commentators in the media. They often whine that in situations like this, they don’t have enough Black women resources to pull from. A lazy person’s out.
There is a solid body of work (be it literary, media, programming, or activist works) by highly intelligent African American women who have been doing anti-sexist work on the ground level for decades: Sister Souljah, Monfia Bandele-Akinwole, Erica Ford, Yvonne Bynoe, Joan Morgan, Farai Chideya, Toni Blackman, Rha Goddess, and countless others across the country – some known, some not. Either way, there is a deep-rooted knowing of injustices that only Black women, regardless of their station in life, can properly articulate.   Â
To Black WomenÂ
When she reached adulthood, an enslaved African named Isabella Baumfree changed her name and identity to the one we know today: Sojourner Truth.
When Harriet Tubman fully grasped an understanding of the world she lived in, she mapped out her own survival, that for her family, and for her larger community. Both women, and others like them, were keenly aware of their unique skills, talents, and missions in life. They were self-permitted to think, organize, speak, and lead. The weight of racism and sexism was ever present, but not immobilizing. When they weren’t invited to help solve or speak about the problems of the day, they crashed the party. More importantly, they were not only pro-active in standing for their right to be free and live well, but for that of their communities too. Tubman, for example, was one of the first social entrepreneurs in our ancestral line. She owned 27 acres of land in upstate New York that she acquired for the hospital and other properties that she built for her family and her community.
Truth and Tubman are sacred models of woman leadership, a legacy of power that is our ancestral golden inheritance. Though from over a hundred years ago, their examples are eerily relevant today.Â
Fast forward: modern models of leadership range from Camille Yarbrough to Sonia Sanchez to Fannie Lou Hamer to Shirley Chisholm to Afeni Shakur and countless others. Our models also include the millions of unrecognized Black women in this country alone who have made a hard decision to combat hate—from within and without. So we need not dig so deeply into our bloodline to be encouraged and empowered, but we need to pull from something…and now! If you are a writer, write on our behalf. Let some of your stories be about helping us heal from this often loveless world. Or heal…with us in mind. Dance with us, sing about us…more. If you are a mother, nurture and discipline the children with our longevity at heart. And if you are without a means to support yourself at this time, or without a loving partner to ease the burdens of the day, keep pushing anyway. Never mind about finding fault, find another way, as my mother says. In every single aspect of our lives, we must be self-permitted to tell the truth about our lives and stories that shape them.
Somebody, quite naturally, is going to be offended in the process. Invariably, someone is going to tell us how wrong we are, but that’s not anyone’s call to make but ours. And I strongly believe that we should partner with Black men, especially, but with anyone else who stands in principle support. But the battle for the respect of Black women, however, is ours to lead.
© 2007, April R. Silver
Here’s a simple but powerful reaction in the midst of this Imus whirlwind. Write and call…Â
General Manager
WFAN-AM
34-12 36th StreetAstoria, NY 11106
718.706.7690
“Central to the success of the station is legendary morning man Don Imus. The Imus in the Morning program is now syndicated to over 90 stations across the United States with an audience in excess of 10 million. It has become a regular stop on the circuit for Washington insiders, the liberal media elite, best-selling authors and the occasional presidential candidate. In September of 1996, MSNBC, the cable/Internet venture of Microsoft and NBC, began a simulcast of the Imus in the Morning show for their own morning programming.â€
 –Excerpt from wfan.comÂ
CBS Radio (owns WFAN)
1515 Broadway
New York, NY
10036212.846.3939Â
MSNBC TV (airs Imus’ show)
One MSNBC Plaza
Secaucus, N.J. 07094
More importantly, a first step toward enlightenment on issues of sex and race— related to and from the minds and souls of Black women—is reading up on Black women writers:Â Â
From today’s The New York Times.Â
Would’ve liked it if she went after her colleagues a little bit, but that’s not her insider’s style.
————
Trash Talk RadioÂ
By GWEN IFILL
Published: April 10, 2007
Washington
LET’S say a word about the girls. The young women with the musical names. Kia and Epiphanny and Matee and Essence. Katie and Dee Dee and Rashidat and Myia and Brittany and Heather.
The Scarlet Knights of Rutgers University had an improbable season, dropping four of their first seven games, yet ending up in the N.C.A.A. women’s basketball championship game. None of them were seniors. Five were freshmen.
In the end, they were stopped only by Tennessee’s Lady Vols, who clinched their seventh national championship by ending Rutgers’ Cinderella run last week, 59-46. That’s the kind of story we love, right? A bunch of teenagers from Newark, Cincinnati, Brooklyn and, yes, Ogden, Utah, defying expectations. It’s what explodes so many March Madness office pools.
But not, apparently, for the girls. For all their grit, hard work and courage, the Rutgers girls got branded “nappy-headed ho’s†— a shockingly concise sexual and racial insult, tossed out in a volley of male camaraderie by a group of amused, middle-aged white men. The “joke†— as delivered and later recanted — by the radio and television personality Don Imus failed one big test: it was not funny.
The serial apologies of Mr. Imus, who was suspended yesterday by both NBC News and CBS Radio for his remarks, have failed another test. The sincerity seems forced and suspect because he’s done some version of this several times before.
I know, because he apparently did it to me.
I was covering the White House for this newspaper in 1993, when Mr. Imus’s producer began calling to invite me on his radio program. I didn’t return his calls. I had my hands plenty full covering Bill Clinton.
Soon enough, the phone calls stopped. Then quizzical colleagues began asking me why Don Imus seemed to have a problem with me. I had no idea what they were talking about because I never listened to the program.
Â
It was not until five years later, when Mr. Imus and I were both working under the NBC News umbrella — his show was being simulcast on MSNBC; I was a Capitol Hill correspondent for the network — that I discovered why people were asking those questions. It took Lars-Erik Nelson, a columnist for The New York Daily News, to finally explain what no one else had wanted to repeat.
“Isn’t The Times wonderful,†Mr. Nelson quoted Mr. Imus as saying on the radio. “It lets the cleaning lady cover the White House.â€
I was taken aback but not outraged. I’d certainly been called worse and indeed jumped at the chance to use the old insult to explain to my NBC bosses why I did not want to appear on the Imus show.
I haven’t talked about this much. I’m a big girl. I have a platform. I have a voice. I’ve been working in journalism long enough that there is little danger that a radio D.J.’s juvenile slap will define or scar me. Yesterday, he began telling people he never actually called me a cleaning lady. Whatever. This is not about me.
It is about the Rutgers Scarlet Knights. That game had to be the biggest moment of their lives, and the outcome the biggest disappointment. They are not old enough, or established enough, to have built up the sort of carapace many women I know — black women in particular — develop to guard themselves against casual insult.
Why do my journalistic colleagues appear on Mr. Imus’s program? That’s for them to defend, and others to argue about. I certainly don’t know any black journalists who will. To his credit, Mr. Imus told the Rev. Al Sharpton yesterday he realizes that, this time, he went way too far.
Yes, he did. Every time a young black girl shyly approaches me for an autograph or writes or calls or stops me on the street to ask how she can become a journalist, I feel an enormous responsibility. It’s more than simply being a role model. I know I have to be a voice for them as well.
So here’s what this voice has to say for people who cannot grasp the notion of picking on people their own size: This country will only flourish once we consistently learn to applaud and encourage the young people who have to work harder just to achieve balance on the unequal playing field.
Let’s see if we can manage to build them up and reward them, rather than opting for the cheapest, easiest, most despicable shots.
Gwen Ifill is a senior correspondent for “The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer†and the moderator of “Washington Week.â€
  


……….Tavis has lined up some veteran journalists for his upcoming PBS Democratic candidates forum.
Although my views of Tavis haven’t changed, I’m glad he’s using the clout that clearly 8,000 journalists of color clearly don’t have. 🙂

If you’re in the U.K., you’ll be watching the new season that starts Saturday. A little history of sorts will be made.
Here are some trailers. And here’s some video interviews.
Added on April 2: Saw the season premiere online today. She was GREAT. Here’s a clip. Enjoy it while it lasts on “you”-know-where. 🙂
Â
Once again, Dave is on point and in front of the herd. I’ve enclosed the open letter from Mumia’s lead attorney at the end of this posting.
March 23, 2007
Third Circuit Appeals Court Sets Date for Oral Arguments in Mumia Case
Mumia Abu-Jamal, the Philadelpia journalist and former Black Panther activist who has been on Pennsylvania’s death row since 1982, will finally have his appeal of his conviction heard by a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which set a date of May 17.
At that session, Abu-Jamal will argue that his original trial for the 1981 murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner was fatally flawed because of racial bias by the prosecutor in jury selection. He will argue that his conviction by that jury was improper because the prosecutor improperly was permitted to lessen jurors’ sense of responsibility by assuring them that whatever they decided, the defendant would get “appeal after appeal” and so their decision “would not be final.” He will also argue that his effort to appeal his conviction was damaged because his post-conviction relief act hearing was presided over by a judge who was clearly biased in favor of the district attorney.
The hearing will also hear a claim by the district attorney that Abu-Jamal’s death sentence—lifted by a Federal Judge in 2001—should be reinstated. The federal district court had ruled that Abu-Jamal’s sentence had been arrived at by a jury that was given improper and confusing instructions by Judge Albert Sabo, and that their sentencing form itself was
misleading.Meanwhile, it has been learned that the Philadelphia District Attorneys Office earlier this month attempted
unsuccessfully to have the entire Third Circuit Court—one of the more liberal appeals courts in the nation—recused from hearing Abu-Jamal’s appeal on the grounds that Abu-Jamal’s claim of jury selection bias was charging then DA Ed Rendell (now Pennsylvania’s governor), with having deliberately violated the law. Rendel’s wife, Marjorie, is one of the appeals court judges in the Third Circuit.Abu-Jamal’s attorney Robert R. Bryan, objecting to the DA’s effort, noted that there was no claim of illegality on the governor’s part, but rather on the part of the prosecutor in the case, Joseph McGill. It is alleged that a succession of Philadelphia DA’s encouraged their prosecutors to remove as many blacks as possible from capital juries, and documentary evidence has been submitted to show that this was done, both by the DA’s office over all, and by assistant DA McGill in his own capital cases. During jury selection for Abu-Jamal’s trial, 11 black potential jurors who had all agreed they
could vote for a death penalty, were removed by McGill using his available peremptory challenges (meaning he did not have to give a reason for his action).In a letter to the DA’s office stating that the request to have all the circuit’s judges recused from hearing the case had been rejected, the clerk of the court said that such a request would have to be made not as a letter, but in the form of a formal motion. In a scolding tone, the letter notes that such a motion “must be in proper form, i.e. an original and three copies and certificate of service.”
“It must have been humiliating for the opposition” to receive such a note, comments attorney Bryan. He notes that to date, the DA has “not had the guts” to make such a formal motion, adding, “We’ll see.”
Authors Website: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net
Authors Bio: Dave Lindorff, a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books (“This Can’t Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy” and “Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal”). His latest book, coauthored with Barbara Olshanshky, is “The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office” (St. Martin’s Press, May 2006). His writing is available at
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net .———–
March 22, 2007
Legal UpdateRe: Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Martin Horn, Pennsylvania Director of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals Nos. 0 1-90 14,02-900 1 (death penalty)Dear Friends:
Today notification was received that oral argument in the case of my client, Mumia Abu-Jamal, is scheduled on Thursday, May 17, 9:30 am, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Ceremonial Courtroom, 1″ Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 6″‘ and Market Streets, Philadelphia. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., and the National Lawyers Guild, which have filed amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs, are also participating.
This case concerns Mr. Abu-Jamal’s right to a fair trial, the struggle against the death penalty, and the political repression of an outspoken journalist. Racism and politics are threads that have run through this case since his 1981 arrest. The complex issues under consideration, which are of great constitutional significance, include:
Whether Mr. Abu-Jamal was denied the right to due process of law and a fair trial under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments because of the prosecutor’s “appeal-after-appeal” argument which encouraged the jury to disregard the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt, and err on the side of guilt.
Whether the prosecution’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude African Americans from sitting on the jury violated Mr. Abu-Jamal’s rights to due process and equal protection of the law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, and contravened Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
Whether the jury instructions and verdict form that resulted in the death penalty deprived Mr. Abu- Jamal of rights guaranteed by the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments to due process of law, equal protection of the law, and not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, and violated Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988), since the judge precluded the jurors from considering any mitigating evidence unless they all agreed on the existence of a particular circumstance.
Whether Mr. Abu-Jamal was denied due process and equal protection of the law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments during post-conviction hearings as the result of the bias and racism of Judge Albert F. Sabo which included the comment that he was “going to help’em fry the ni – – er”.
Recently the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office sent a letter to the court suggesting that the entire Third Circuit should disqualify itself from deciding the case of my client. We filed a reply strongly objecting to this absurd request, explaining that the position of opposing counsel was “utterly unfounded and should be rejected.” On March 10 the court rebuked the prosecution, advising that it had failed to follow proper procedure and thus no action would be taken.
Professor Judith L. Ritter, associate counsel, and I are in this case to win a new and fair trial for Mr. Abu-Jamal. The goal is for our client to be free. Nevertheless, he remains in great danger. If all is lost, he will be executed. Your interest in this struggle for human rights and against the death penalty is appreciated.
Yours very truly,
Robert R. Bryan
Lead counsel for Mumia Abu-Jamal
 
………my colleague Roland S. Martin, who has just joined CNN.
Here’s one of the official releases:
News Release
Contact:Â Danielle Robinson
March 13, 2007
312 226 555210:30 a.m. ET
Host/Columnist/Author/Journalist Roland S. Martin Joins CNNÂ Â Â Â
Roland S. Martin, a nationally syndicated columnist and Chicago-based radio host, will join CNN/U.S as a contributor and analyst for several programs and CNN will develop various other programming concepts around him in the next several months. The appointment is effective immediately.
     “It’s a well-deserved and a fantastic opportunity for one of the country’s most unique journalists. Roland’s multi-media story-telling presence has now expanded to cable television to an audience that should find his message most refreshing,” says Marc Watts of Signature Media Group who negotiated Mr. Martin’s new deal. “He has become a familiar face to CNN viewers the last three years, already having appeared on numerous CNN programs and this deal solidifies a larger role for Roland.”
     A nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate, Martin most recently served as executive editor of The Chicago Defender, the nation’s largest black daily newspaper. Some writers called Martin a “savior” of what was described as a failing newspaper.Â
He is a commentator for TV One Cable Network and hosts The Roland S. Martin Show on WVON/1690AM in Chicago each weekday. He is the author of “Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith” and “Speak, Brother! A Black Man’s View of America.”
     As an analyst, Martin provides news reports for American Urban Radio Networks and has appeared numerous times on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, Court TV, BET Nightly News, BBC News, National Public Radio, The Word Network and America’s Black Forum.
     “From President Bush to Oprah Winfrey to Charles Gibson, Roland has shown a knack for asking probing, insightful and news-making questions,” Watts said. “Roland and I have been friends for 20 years. We first met when he was a high school student in Houston. At the time I was a reporter for the local CBS station KHOU-TV.”
     “As a multifaceted journalist steeped in the traditions of storytelling and truth-seeking, Roland offers a powerful voice on subjects ranging from politics to religion to race to numerous other social issues,” Jon Klein, President of CNN/U.S. said. “We’re very pleased to have him contribute to a wide range of CNN stories.
     “CNN has made a sincere commitment to giving its audience a breadth of important stories not typically found in mainstream media,” Martin said. “I am pleased to be a part of that effort and to do my part to see they rise to that challenge.”
     “Roland will continue to reside in Chicago while commuting to New York to fulfill his responsibilities for CNN. In addition to appearing on various news programs as an analyst Roland will play a key role in the development of programming concepts that compliment his style,” Watts said.
     He is the former founding news editor for Savoy magazine and the former founding editor of BlackAmericaWeb.com, owned by nationally syndicated radio host Tom Joyner and Radio One.
     Martin previously served as owner/publisher of Dallas-Fort Worth Heritage, a Christian monthly newspaper and worked as managing editor of the Houston Defender and the Dallas Weekly. He also has worked for KRLD/1080AM, KKDA-AM in Dallas, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram and the Austin American-Statesman.
     During his journalism career, Martin has won more than 20 awards, including a regional Edward R. Murrow award from the Radio-Television News Directors Association; several first place awards from the Dallas-Fort Worth Association of Black Communicators; two citations from the National Associated Press Managing Editors Conference; the top sports reporting award in 1997 from the National Association of Black Journalists; and honors from the Houston Press Club.
     He earned a bachelor’s of science degree in journalism from Texas A&M University and is currently working on a master’s degree in Christian communications at Louisiana Baptist University. He is a member of the National Association of Black Journalists, Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity and the American Society of Newspaper Editors.    Â

…….my friend, Hazel Trice Edney, who has been named Editor-in-Chief of the NNPA News Service, which includes BlackPressUSA.com.
Although many sisters have worked as the News Service’s Managing Editor in the 1990s and early 2000s, in terms of power over content, she may be the first woman to serve as the News Service’s EIC in the organization’s 60-plus year history.
I always said Hazel was another Ethel Payne. Now I have proof. 🙂