After reading the stories below, check out these interviews. And don’t forget to watch the “60 Minutes” tribute this Sunday night.

NEW YORK (CNN) — Ed Bradley, the longtime “60 Minutes” correspondent who reported on subjects ranging from jazz musicians to the Columbine school shootings, has died. He was 65. 

Bradley died Thursday at New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital of leukemia, according to staff members at the CBS program.

Bradley joined “60 Minutes” during the 1981-82 season after two years as White House correspondent for CBS News and three years at “CBS Reports.” His reporting over the years won him a Peabody Award, 19 Emmys and a Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award, among many others.

CNN’s John Roberts, who worked with Bradley at CBS, said the newsman was “always a person you could sit down with and he could keep you intrigued for hours at a time with the stories he could tell.”

Roberts called Bradley a “first-rate” journalist.

“He clearly was a field reporter,” said Howard Kurtz, the Washington Post media reporter. “He did not want to be chained to a desk.” Kurtz also hosts CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

“He was somebody who liked being out there on the story, whether it was in the Vietnam War or whether it was doing investigative work or bringing alive the plight of families who were dealing with illnesses or violence or other issues he covered,” Kurtz added.

Bradley was known for his thoughtful, mellifluous voice and often deceptively relaxed interviewing style. In 2000, he conducted the only television interview with condemned Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. His hourlong report on the plight of Africans dying of AIDS, “Death by Denial,” won a Peabody.

Bradley, a great music lover, also interviewed Miles Davis, Lena Horne and Paul Simon, among other performers. He once moonlighted as a disc jockey, earning $1.50 an hour spinning records while working as a teacher by day.

Bradley began his career in radio at WDAS in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1963. In 1967 he moved to New York and radio station WCBS, and then joined CBS News as a stringer in the Paris bureau in 1971.

After a stint in Saigon (now Ho Chi Minh City), Vietnam, he came to Washington in 1974. He covered Jimmy Carter’s presidential campaign in 1976.

CNN’s David Fitzpatrick, a former CBS producer who worked with Bradley, said there were tears in the halls of CBS News after word of his passing.

“He was gracious,” Fitzpatrick said. “He would always have a smile.”

Bradley is survived by his wife, Patricia Blanchet.

——-

Ed Bradley, The News Pioneer Who Never Lost His Cool

By Wil Haygood
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 10, 2006; C01

 

Ed Bradley had cool like a vault has money.

The celebrated “60 Minutes” newsman, who died yesterday of leukemia at 65, was certainly learned, absolutely a globe-trotter, and highly honored. But it was his cool that drew bearhugs from men and cheek-to-cheek kisses from women all over the world.

Deborah Willis, a professor of photography and imaging at New York University, came of age in Philadelphia — Bradley’s birthplace — during the 1970s, when the newsman was routinely showing up on national news broadcasts. Women were pointing to his picture in Jet and Ebony, in Time and Newsweek. Ed Bradley came to the American party with crossover cachet.

“He had this style that everyone tried to emulate,” says Willis.

Willis chatted with Bradley two months ago in Manhattan. Bradley had arrived at the New York Historical Society to listen to her interview the artist Betye Saar. Afterward, “He complimented me on my interview! Do you know how much that meant to me?” she says.

Willis noticed how people watched Bradley at her lecture. “There was the cool pose that wasn’t posing. He personified this look. It was a constructed self, constructed from a history of men who knew what it meant to be masculine and cool.”

After college, Bradley taught school and did some unpaid disc jockey work. But he knew he had a voice, and the kind of diction that might lend itself to a job with a microphone. He started on the news side of CBS radio in 1967. Soon enough he was in Vietnam. It was a kind of trial assignment.

“They made no promises to him when he went to Vietnam,” says Lee Thornton, who covered Jimmy Carter’s White House for CBS along with Bradley, both among the first blacks to do so.

But reputations were made in the Vietnam jungle. When Bradley emerged, with a thick but well-coiffed Afro and beard, his profile began to soar.

“He had his own kind of jazz,” says Thornton, who now hosts the cable talk show “A Moment With,” which is taped at the University of Maryland.

“He had a swagger and class. Mind you, he was not the first generation of black males at the networks. Hal Walker preceded him [at CBS]. But he brought his generation’s feeling of: ‘I have a right to be here. So let me show you.’ ”

Thornton remembers overhearing Bradley talking to “60 Minutes” producers as he made a follow-up pitch on the telephone shortly after his initial job interview for the program. “He was not, in the beginning, wanted by ’60 Minutes.’ I was there the day he kept making his case to them. I listened from one of those little booths near him. His case to them was: ‘I’m good, period.’ ”

He often turned his interviews into gabfests, into something akin to a kitchen chat at Thanksgiving. (They took on far more intensity when he was interviewing murderers or bombers.) And there were those across black America who wondered if as many black legends — Lena Horne, Muhammad Ali — would have been profiled were it not for his presence.

“Ed was as comfortable talking to Lena Horne as standing out on the White House lawn,” says Thornton. “What he brought to ’60 Minutes’ was not only the diversity of his person — his hipness, his music — but he extended that to the stories he covered. Thereby introducing America to those things.”

Thornton never saw meanness in Bradley. But a temperamental moment does stand out: “I was at CBS when an assignment editor asked Ed to do something. Ed didn’t like the story idea. He didn’t think it was up to his level. Ed stood up and looked at the editor and said, ‘Find. Yourself. Another. Dude.’ Oh, Lord, he was funny.”

Bradley’s pioneering presence on the air was widely noted. Last year he received a lifetime achievement award from the National Association of Black Journalists, in a ceremony here in Washington. He seemed genuinely moved at the event, staring at a screen as snatches of his memorable interviews scrolled by.

His hair had long gone gray. He had an earring. And he had raindrops in his eyes when he accepted the award from longtime BET newscaster Ed Gordon.

“Ed’s demeanor said to America: ‘Not everybody comes from the same cookie cutter,’ ” Gordon said yesterday. ” ‘But here we are.’ ”

Gordon says many black journalists are bedeviled by the prospect of being labeled “a black journalist,” convincing themselves they are shortchanging their breadth and scope. Bradley never ran away from his cultural pride, Gordon says, finding poetry where it existed. “Ed knew he was smart enough to do any story, be it on the Oklahoma City bomber or Lena Horne. That’s what was great about Ed.”

A bevy of friends had been gathering at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York in the waning days of Bradley’s life. Among them was Charlayne Hunter-Gault, a longtime friend.

Hunter-Gault, who has had her own distinguished career in journalism, used to run into Bradley all the time. He’d be on his way someplace. Lugging bags, looking bleary-eyed, off to another time zone, just back from another time zone. She didn’t understand it: All those honors, well into his 60s, running like a college intern. “I’d say, ‘Ed, you’ve got nothing to prove.’ He’d say, ‘I’ve got a job to do.’ ”

She walked into his hospital room the other day and he was tussling with the covers, moving his legs, his arms. “He was fighting,” says Hunter-Gault. “It made me think of that Sterling Brown poem, ‘Strong Men Keep A’Comin.’ ”
You sang Me an’ muh baby gonna shine, shine

Me an’ muh baby gonna shine

The strong men keep-a-comin’ on

The strong men git stronger

 

Note: Click here for the audio version or visit voxunion.com for the stream and MP3 download options.

 

White Liberals and Glass Houses: A Reminder that Black Radical Journalism is a Tradition

By Jared A. Ball

Even as they decry the practice of exclusion among the mainstream press, the white left-led media reform movement does the same to Black American and domestic or local news. While just a brief overview, one far from being exhaustive in its study, this commentary is both a postscript to past analysis performed on the subject and a prelude of more in-depth forthcoming work. However, following a recent study published by the white-left media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting or FAIR and in advance of my own participation at next year’s Media Reform Conference in Memphis, I would at least like to propose the following for consideration.

This situation is precisely why I make mixtapes. As crazy as it sounds to some, “FreeMix Radio: The Original Mixtape Radio Show,” a Washington, D.C.-based freely distributed mixtape CD, is as likely to let an audience in on the real conditions of the United States, particularly Black America, or to allow for the airing of the real critical political hip-hop, as any popular media, including that produced from the white liberal left. In other spaces I have analyzed, and will continue to analyze, the fact that maybe more than any other popular form of musical expression, political (or at least non-abusive) hip-hop is least likely to gain access to any airwaves in the United States. Even my beloved WPFW Pacifica Radio—here in D.C. and with whom I currently work—has an allegiance to jazz that relegates only 5 hours a week to hip-hop and that’s it for the entire city, at least when it comes to the type of hiphop of which I speak. This leaves our youth solely at the hands and whims of a commercial pop culture world which, in the words of Jonathan Kozol, is bent on their “cognitive decapitation.” In terms of news or perspective, little changes when it comes to the white left. We agree that the right-led mainstream news environment is a destructive mess, with many of us considering even attempting change in that arena a hopeless waste of time. But perhaps we will yet again need to condemn our comrades on the left and further the development of more Black-centered progressive or radical journalism.

The October 13, 2006 edition of Counterspin—the 30-minute weekly radio show from Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a white liberal media watchdog group—was dedicated to their recent study on PBS’s “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.” It detailed the right-wing slant of the show and an overall lack of inclusiveness in major media. Among the report’s findings were that on the “NewsHour,” men appeared 4 times as much as women, Republicans twice as often as Democrats and that only 15% of all guests were so-called “people of color.” But even with such distinguished guests as FAIR’s own Julie Hollar (who also co-wrote the study) and media scholar Robert McChesney, founder of the media reform group Free Press, nothing was mentioned of their own inclusiveness failure rates. It must also be noted, parenthetically, that their standard of inclusion also remained fairly conservative in that it only measured Republican versus Democrat, as if that is somehow enough of a distinction. In other words, their study would be even more damning were it to include even more white radical perspectives of Communism, Socialism, Anarchy, etc. not to mention were it to include the varied radical concerns among African Americans (or Africans in America or New Afrikans). That is, if inclusion of Democrats is a standard, then where are we to look for Pan-Africanism or African Socialism?

But if we take their radio programs as signs of their particular range of coverage and perspective of that coverage, understanding as we do that FAIR, for instance, also publishes a print edition called Extra!, McChesney and Free Press all publish widely, etc. and so on, we would notice an absolute paucity of focus on African America. Future analysis will expand on this but I am enough of a listener and reader (I read McChesney widely and have interviewed him myself twice and even once emailed him with these very concerns) I feel confident in saying that similar findings would result.

The FAIR study mentioned uses invited guests as a leading component in their analysis. Being that I am not able to determine in all cases the race or ethnicity of guests by listening to them or reading their names in show summaries and recognizing that the inclusion of Black faces is not necessarily a guarantor of Black-centered or Black radical perspectives, I can make an assessment based on keynote topic selection as to whether or not particular attention was paid, in this case, to Black America. If we just look at the last calendar year and the primary or central themes of Counterspin we notice that only four of those themes were potentially specific to the conditions or struggles of African Americans and every single one was related to Katrina (shows on: 10/14/05, 1/27/06, 3/10/06 and 9/1/06). Each of these shows were follow ups on Katrina, but while we can give some benefit of the doubt, there would need to be further investigation to determine exactly what percentage of these stories were about Black people as opposed to issues of finance or the funneling of tax dollars via friendly no-bid contracts, etc. Even still, the horrific event some thought would bring media into more of a discussion of race and class has largely failed to do so—even within the media reform left wing.

McChesney is no better in this regard. In his weekly one-hour radio show Media Matters there has been little discussion of race and the Black struggle or current condition and when there is his invited guest expert is likely to be white male. In roughly the last year he too has had only 4 shows which discussed race at all, and these not necessarily the condition of Black America or its ongoing struggle, and 2 of these shows had white male guests Robert Jensen (10/02/05) and David Roediger (7/24/05). I wrote him recently an email reminding him that during these shows while he twice referenced writer and journalist Glen Ford (formerly of Black Commentator and now BlackAgendaReport.com) he had yet to actually invite him on as a featured guest. McChesney did remind me of what I had known that in the 2 other instances Sundiata Cha-Jua (3/19/06) and Salim Muwakkil (1/29/06) had appeared bringing the grand total of Black guests to 2 in the course of roughly 50 shows in the past year.

In preparation for our participation in Free Press’ upcoming conference on media reform my IndustryEars.com colleague Paul Porter too noted the lack of inclusion of Black voices and was even inclined to remark how “Free Press is the Clear Channel of Media Reform.” Porter continued, saying that, “It has become blatantly obvious that the media reform movement is as racist as media ownership. While we continue to lose ground daily for some strange reason our efforts often lead us to align with the groups that marginalize us. Groups like Free Press and forums such as Pacifica’s “Democracy Now!” have systematically added token voices to appear as if our agendas are the same. When you look at key reform groups over the years, they consistently hire people as public spokespeople who don’t look or think like us. Until we collectively form a unified partnership, we will continue to be marginalized and basically used until further notice. I am sure I will hear the benefits from some of you on why we need to align with larger reform groups, but the proof has been in past history. I am most interested in change. Speaking at the Memphis media reform or conducting a panel is of no use unless it changes the landscape.

Ah, yes. “Democracy Now!,” the new weekday darling of the New and Old Left. In my 2005 study of that show, I noted that of the 176 possible shows in the calendar year prior to the levees flooding in New Orleans, only 21 shows, or 12% had any focus on Black America. Of those 21, 10 were historical references to the Civil Rights era, including 2 about the historic—yet re-emergent—story of Emmitt Till, but only 4 with any contemporary focus. Of the 4, all were with the late activist Damu Smith surrounding much of his organizational work on issues of politics and environmental racism. One would hope that this powerful media outlet would not need to await another of the caliber of Damu before these issues gain coverage. Or perhaps such a figure will go unnoticed because of such inattention.

Now, this is not to say that the white left is the cause of the problem. But they are a problem. The pattern of abandoning Black American concerns for those considered more pressing or more exotic is again playing out in 2006. The fact remains that listeners to the radio programs discussed above will have a greater working knowledge of Iraq, Israel or Palestine than of Black America. I am sure part of the response will be that there is a war, or that international news is sorely lacking in mainstream press. No doubt this is true. However, I think it is more of a return of the left’s abandonment of the Movement when Civil Rights turned into Black Power: “You don’t want us? The fuck you too! We can cover Vietnam or the environment or the whales!” It is necessary to inform the nation of its role in and relationship to international politics. However, an overly intense focus on international issues, or to domestically tend only to cover issues at the highest federal levels, borders on copping out. Why? Because in each case the mostly white audience will feel appeased of its guilt in being complicit with a North American juggernaut, seeing themselves as powerless to make real change. More attention to local and domestic concerns would be more likely to challenge people to become more active in fixing, internally, the nation that most of the world rightly recognizes as the greatest threat to world peace.

 

But what we are seeing now are the remnants of the Civil Rights and Black Power era sellouts and conformists who have abandoned any attempt at domestic revolution in favor of challenging mainstream coverage of federal-level or international concerns. In the end the white left follow an agenda set by the elite owners of media and the world and leave the rest of us unsupported, protected or covered. The issue of communication, as Mark Lloyd has said, is a civil rights one but we are not seeing the same kind of white liberal, progressive or radical journalism that supported those efforts. Meanwhile, popular Black media has convinced us we need no such similar effort in Black journalism.

White America, as Dr. King said 40 years ago, has not done enough to condition itself out of white supremacy. Today, I feel a sense from this wing of political struggle that says, “We did that Black stuff already. You got your rights, you have celebrities and Black journalists. We’re moving onward and upward.” Well, despite the imagery, Black America is no better off today than at any other time. We remain imprisoned, ill-educated, with poverty and segregation levels that rival any other point in our history. Plantation slavery remains the standard by which we measure the condition of African Americans, which, unfortunately, prevents us from seeing that what currently exists is not progress but the proverbial knife being pulled 5 inches out of a 9-inch deep wound, as Malcolm X once made clear. And of any segment of the population who should be most able; given access, education and proclaimed criticism to see through the barrage of false imagery its our white friends of the upper-middle class left. But more likely is the reality that the trend remains much like Dr. King again said of the white left: They have “in devastating numbers walked off with the aggressor” where it appears as though the “white segregationist and the average white citizen has more in common with one ano ther than either had with the negro.”

Dr. Todd Steven Burroughs and I have argued for the creation of a B-SPAN, a Black national news service dedicated to year-round coverage of Black struggle and condition. I make mixtapes, do low-power and Internet radio—all of which is meant to support or exemplify underground and alternative journalism or the development of space for the expression of a decolonized culture. But more will need to be done in media and political organization if real progress is to occur. We must remember that the primary reason, despite a lack of intent to include from the white left, that Black Americans have eschewed “media reform” as a “movement” is because from the beginning it was and is understood that dominant media work for the dominant and that there is little chance of democratizing media in a decidedly un-democratic society. From Sam Cornish to Marcus Garvey, W.E.B. DuBois, Ida B. Wells, Robert and Mabel Williams, Sam Napier, Malcolm X, et. al., Black radicalism has always included an underground/alternative press component. None argued that reforming media would reform society they all argued that in order to reform or revolutionize society a supportive media would have to be created. And this is not exclusive to Black America. As noted by Lauren Kessler, radical journalism is a “tradition,” not an anomalous “time-bound” occurrence. This brief look at the white left need only be a reminder that we cannot expect that movement to be ours.

Black America, whether in journalism or larger political struggle, is fast-approaching complete isolation mostly from half-hearted and apolitical media inclusion and journalistic practice but also from a complete inattention from our white left comrades. As we work within we must also work without.

This has been Jared Ball for VOXUNION MEDIA and FreeMix Radio.

Dr. Jared A. Ball is an assistant professor of Communications/Media Studies at Morgan State University. He is editor of the Words, Beats and Life Journal of Hip-Hop and Global Culture and is also the founder and creator of “FreeMix Radio: The Original Mixtape Radio Show,” a rap music mixtape committed to the practice of underground emancipatory journalism. He and his work can be found online at VOXUNION.COM.