The Way We (Struggle To) Live In New York City, Circa 2007

Got this from April Silver.

New York’s Affordable Housing Crisis

By Kevin Powell

Stacy had been subletting an apartment in an expansive complex on the Upper Westside of Manhattan from a family friend for ten-plus years. A product of working-class New York, this arrangement helped to give Stacy’s life a foundation and, for once, she was enjoying the fruits of the Big Apple experience. So you can imagine the shock and awe when Stacy, a single mother who scraped to make ends meet as she raised her son, received a notice from the management of her rent-stabilized building that she would have to vacate unless she were able to shell out $2400 a month in rent, a huge leap from the $900 she was currently paying. Terrified, confused, and sure she would wind up in a shelter or on the streets if she did not react quickly, Stacy, an administrative assistant by profession, sought and found a small apartment for her and her son in one of the most violent neighborhoods in Brooklyn. She is thinking of leaving New York City altogether because she feels trapped by her environment; and because over half of her income each year goes to rent. 

Imani is a modestly successful model who supplements her earnings by bartending at exclusive nightclubs. Financially astute, she has been saving her money to purchase a condo here in New York, her adopted hometown-the city Imani would prefer to live in rather than anywhere else in America. And why not? Imani is young, talented, energetic, intellectually curious, and she feels it is here that she can achieve her dreams as an actress, or whatever it is she so desires. But Imani is in crisis mode. For the past several months, the management company of the building where Imani rents (her cousin’s name is on the lease) has been harassing her about her residency, threatening to evict her, refusing to acknowledge that although she has been in this unit for two years, has written every single rent check, from her checking account, that somehow she is suddenly not eligible to rent that unit, with or without her name on the lease. Terrified and confused about the matter, Imani is being forced to go to court to fight for her apartment, and she has no idea what she will do if forced to vacate or pay a substantial rent increase if she wants to keep her living space.

Welcome to the terrordome called the struggle for affordable housing in New York City, circa the early days of the 21st century. I have been living in New York, mostly in Brooklyn, for 17 years and I have heard variations on the stories cited above multiple times, from renters and subletters alike, from New Yorkers of all ethnicities and cultures, all religions and faiths, all educational levels and occupations. Clearly, there is something rotten in Gotham, and it is the fact that millions of New Yorkers, quite literally, cannot afford a place to live. I knew it was a problem as I watched a parade of folks come and go in my neighborhood, in my borough, in my city, the past several years. I knew it was a problem with the loss of massive housing developments like Stuyvesant Town. I knew it was a problem with the recent threat to Starrett City as a mixed income and culturally diverse experiment in affordable housing in New York. There at Starrett City a developer attempted-and failed-to purchase it for a billion dollars or so, with the intention of creating top-dollar luxury apartments on the development’s vacant land. And God only knows what he and his partners planned to do with the tenants already inhabiting the previously built towers. We who are honest know the deal: New York City is propelled by and on the backs of working class and middle class New Yorkers of all persuasions. That was the case in 17th century New Amsterdam, the original name; and that is the case today at this critical juncture in our city’s history. I moved to this great metropolis, from across the river in Jersey City, because I wanted to be in a space where, as a writer and an activist, I could encounter the myriad of people, social classes, sights, sounds, languages, cultures, foods, and attitudes as I could no where else. And I moved here because I knew that in spite of all its big-city problems, that New York is the one place in America where you could walk half a block, turn a corner, go one subway stop, and, without question, feel the heartbeat of what former Mayor David Dinkins called “a gorgeous mosaic” at any given moment. 

But that New York City is being threatened by what could potentially be our worst housing crisis in decades. Like Stacy, more than two million New Yorkers pay over half their income in rent. In just three years (2002 to 2005), the city’s subsidized affordable housing shrunk by 11%. We know that state and federal initiatives like Mitchell-Lama, Section 8, and public housing were specifically created to serve and protect low to moderate-income urban dwellers. And we know that tens of thousands of Mitchell-Lama and Section 8 apartments have been lost; and there lingers a loaded and uncomfortable question about the future of public housing in New York.   

So we have a battle on our hands. We have to ask ourselves what kind of New York do we envision 10 years from now, or by, say, 2030, as Mayor Mike Bloomberg has instructed us to do? Is it a New York City where all New Yorkers can continue to live and coexist to make this metropolis the most magical, the most multicultural, the most multidimensional, and the most multilingual on this planet? Or are we going to sit idly by as New York becomes an oasis mainly for those able to rent or sublease at or above today’s market value for an apartment?

Stacy has already lost her apartment, and Imani may as well. But concerned New Yorkers can help turn the tide in the fight for affordable housing by pressing newly-elected Governor Spitzer to reverse the destructive practices put forth during the Pataki administration which favor landlords over tenants. This means repealing “vacancy decontrol,” preventing displacing rent increases, extending rent regulations to all developments, preserving state-built affordable housing, and enacting legislation that gives tenants and tenant-selected qualified buyers a right of first refusal to purchase buildings put on the market. This means that while we applaud Mayor Bloomberg’s plans to create 94,000 new affordable housing units, and to preserve 71,000 existing ones, we also must move to maintain the nearly 1.5 million housing units at risk if local and state elected officials do not act immediately. This means, too, supporting the efforts of key organizations like the Working Families Party and Housing Here and Now, who are spearheading this latest charge for affordable housing in New York.

And, for sure, it means some of us will have to burrow into our souls and ask ourselves what New York City, our city, will look like if all affordable housing, and its occupants, were slowly but surely to disappear in the coming years and decades?

Kevin Powell, a community organizer and writer based in Brooklyn, New York, is the author of 7 books, including his most recent essay collection, Someday We’ll All Be Free (Soft Skull Press) . He can be reached at kepo1@aol.com .

To learn more about the New York City affordable housing crisis, and to get involved, please visit these websites:

Working Families Party

Housing Here and Now

Black Dollars, Black Sense :)

 

Are books like this going to be regulated to history? Hmmm…….

Thought this was good enough to share in full.

Article published Mar 6, 2007

Procter & Gamble ads targeted to blacks paid off

By Cliff Peale
Gannett News Service

CINCINNATI — When Procter & Gamble Co. rolled out its Tide with a Touch of Downy detergent in late 2004, it included a special advertising campaign targeting black consumers.

“Nostalgia Dad” featured a black man lovingly cradling his sleeping young son. The ad was designed to convey warmth and fatherly caretaking, and the pair’s crisp white T-shirts seemed almost peripheral. It also was designed to counter stereotypes of fatherless black households.

“It was very deliberate to have a man with his son,” says Najoh Tita-Reid, associate director of P&G’s multicultural marketing unit. “It was very deliberate for him to have a wedding ring on.”

The heartwarming images are only the latest evolution of a 40-year movement inside Cincinnati-based P&G to try to reach more black consumers. The early efforts — in the 1960s, when racial tensions throughout the country were running high and white faces dominated nearly every commercial message — were not without risks.

Today P&G is acknowledged as a leader in creating advertising for black consumers.

“Without question, P&G has to be seen as one of the companies that other companies pattern their behavior after,” says Ken Smikle, president of Target Market News in Chicago, which tracks patterns of advertising to black consumers.

Along the way, reputations were made and enhanced. Crest toothpaste used a young Bill Cosby for a television commercial in 1969. In the 1980s, some Tide ads featured the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater.

In the past decade, the movement has accelerated. P&G spends at least six times more on media targeting black consumers than it did five years ago. And it’s constantly adding new ways to reach black consumers, such as a 2004 sponsorship deal with the popular Tom Joyner morning radio show.

Today you’ll see Queen Latifah on commercials and Internet sites pitching a Cover Girl line for black women. Angela Bassett promotes the benefits of Olay body lotion for black skin. Soon, Tiger Woods will tout the virtues of Gillette razors.

Black spending power is driving much of P&G’s strategy.

The $68 billion company has pledged to investors that it will add at least 5 percent to total sales every year, and the spending power of black Americans is an important piece of that growth, having reached $799 billion in 2006, according to the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia.

Procter executives say they want both marketing efforts and employee base to reflect the more diverse face of the 21st century American consumer.

“We need to define diversity broadly and leverage it to the hilt,” chairman and chief executive A.G. Lafley said last fall at an internal event. “Being ‘in touch’ is an attitude. To lead in this kind of environment, we need a balance of business skills and empathetic skills.”

Beyond "War And Famine And Refugees"

 

Kalamu strikes again. Dug this quote in the profile of Nigerian novelist Helon Habila:

What upsets him even more, though, is an image of his homeland that he has found in the West. In “Waiting for an Angel,” Lomba is told by a woman at a party: “You really must try and get arrested—that’s the quickest way to make it as poet. You’ll have no problem with visas after that, you might even get an international award.” I refer him to the words of the Ugandan writer, Doreen Bainganawho: “Sometimes I wish my life had been more tragic. This is because my audience expects me, as an African writer, to regale them with tales of hunger, war and catastrophe.” He agrees.

“There is a tendency, especially in the West, to look at African writing as all about war and famine and refugees,” he has found. “When they think about Africa they expect someone to be dying. But literature is supposed to show you life in a more balanced way. Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a murderer, ambitious; but he loves his wife, he is a general, a hero. It takes more effort to make a character round, but it makes him more compelling. And Africans are just like any other people: happy, sad, optimistic. If readers don’t want to see people laughing, then they should read other people’s novels.”

Fifteen Years Later During Sweeps/Black History Month, CNN Discovers Excesses In HipHop :)

 

The usual CNN simplicity. I’m glad that Zahn was open enough, at least, to include voices like Roland Martin, Chuck D, Michael Eric Dyson, Tim Wise, Keith Boykin, Byron Hurt, etc.

I don’t think it’s nitpicking to say that it would have been better if the author-talking-head roster had included some bonifide hiphop feminists.

It also could have included a comment from Paul Porter (although Roland, to his credit, kept trying to go in that direction), but perhaps that would have cut too close to home. (Perhaps folks like Paul have to write books and/or produce documentaries to get in the national-broadcast guest booker “mix.” Sad reality.)

The show’s online if you missed it—AND WANT TO PAY FOR IT. Hmmm…….. CNN’s not exploiting Blaxploitation during Black History Month, is it?  🙂

Did You Know………..

 Stokely Speaks: From Black Power to Pan-Africanism

…..that “Stokely Speaks” has just been republished?

Got this email from TheBlackList.

I added the sentence about finding the group of the Web because the organization’s website was not yet ready at the time of the email.

————— 

 

“Stokely Speaks” Is Republished! 

We hope this email finds you in the best of health and spirits.

Permit us a moment of your time to inform you that, on February 1, 2007, Lawrence Hill Publishers, an imprint of Chicago Review Press, officially launched the republication of “Stokely Speaks: From Black Power Back To Pan-Africanism.”

As you are perhaps aware, “Stokely Speaks” was originally published by Random House in 1971. It demonstrates and summarizes, through 15 of Kwame Ture’s speeches, his ideological and organizational history, growth and development from 1965 to 1971. It serves, to some extent, as a history of the People and his generation, and their movements and organizations, especially the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and Black Panther Party, two organizations that Kwame worked for and helped build, during those six seminal years. It also serves as a record of some of his contributions and impact.

Mumia Abu-Jamal has written the New Foreword to “Stokely Speaks.” His honesty and integrity, humility and dignity is extremely refreshing and expected. His mind and pen are razor sharp and free, even though his body remains chained behind prison walls. Kwame’s family, co-workers and supporters will be forever grateful to him, and to Pam Afrika who introduced us to him, for making their contribution towards our 35-year effort to republish this classic. Bob Brown has written the Preface to the 2007 Edition.

We launch, through this email, a worldwide campaign to make “Stokely Speaks” required reading in high schools, colleges, workplaces, churches, mosques, temples, synagogues, prisons, discussion/study groups, and meetings in every corner of Africa, the African Diaspora and the World.

We hope that you will write and publish a review, (please forward us a copy), promote “Stokley Speaks” on talk radio and by word-of-mouth, organize discussion/study groups and meetings, books launch parties, etc.

We also hope that you will help us find translators and publishers in Traditional African and other languages.

Surely you will agree, even if you disagree with Kwame, that this is a worthwhile effort!

Permit us also to inform you that the All-African People’s Revolutionary Party, which is based in Conakry, Guinea, takes the occasion of the republication of “Stokely Speaks” to launch a two-year and worldwide ideological offensive, recruitment and networking drive and campaign.

The A-APRP (GC) will, with your moral, material and financial help,

(1) Introduce Kwame Ture, and his work, study and struggle, to a new generation of progressive and revolutionary students and youth;

(2) Revitalize existing members and supporters of the A-APRP (GC), and recruit new ones; and

(3) Renew old alliances, and build new ones, with progressive and revolutionary forces, movements, organizations and governments in every
corner of Africa, the African Diaspora, and the World.

TO PARAPHRASE KWAME TURE, WE WILL ORGANIZE, ORGANIZE, ORGANIZE, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, AND BUILD THE A-APRP(GC), LIKE YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN BEFORE!

We hope that you will help us continue and expand Kwame’s and our almost five decades of work, study and struggle, by “any and all means necessary,” and by any and all means that you can.

You can help by inviting Bob Brown, and other A-APRP(GC) organizers, to your country, city, community, campus, workplace, church, mosque, temple, synagogue, prison, discussion/study group, or meeting. The theme of Bob’s  presentation is “From Black Power Back To Pan-Africanism.” Bob will offer information that you have never heard before, and a perspective that you will regret not having heard first hand. He will speak, directly, honestly and militantly, to a new generation of progressive and revolutionary students and youth in every corner of Africa, the African Diaspora, and the World. He will call them to service and action, and offer them a mass, revolutionary, Pan-African and International  program of work, study and struggle.

Who knows? We might find dozens, perhaps hundreds or thousands, of new Kwame Ture’s among our daughters and sons, grand- daughters and grand sons, poised and ready to make their contribution to, and impact on Africa and the World. All they need is your and our encouragement, enablement, and empowerment!

For more information on how you can:

(1) Make a DONATION towards continuing and expanding Kwame’s and our Work, Study and Struggle,

(2) INVITE A-APRP (GC) Organizers, speakers and cultural artists to your country, city, community, campus, workplace, church, mosque, temple, synagogue, or prison,

(3) Become a MEMBER of the A-APRP (GC),

(4) Become a SUPPORTER of the A-APRP (GC),

(5) Renew or build an ALLIANCE with the A-APRP (GC),

please contact the A-ARP (GC) by finding us on the Web.

Thank you in advance for any and all assistance that you might give!

The Story Of A Lanky Lawyer From Illinois

Sen. Barack Obama, presidential race, democratic nomination

So Barack claims Lincoln, even if the reverse wouldn’t have happened if Lincoln’s life depended on it? Ah, the African-American experience. 🙂

Oh, and before you celebrate too much…… 🙂

Meanwhile, my friend and boss Bill believes that The Obama Phenomenon is really about whites feeling completely comfortable with their consolidation of power. I couldn’t agree more. 

The Negro Bowl And The March To The Bookstore

 

Tavis Smiley is in danger of becoming the next Oprah Winfrey, and that’s not a compliment.

For what seemed like the zillionth time, I sat around all day Saturday watching his annual “Tavis Smiley Presents: State of the Black Union,” live on (where else?) C-SPAN. I forgot who first thought of calling it “The Negro Bowl,” but the moniker seems appropriate.

I’m concerned because Smiley—somebody I admire for creating his own national Black-oriented forums—is getting a little too much power to frame the national debate of people of color.

At this year’s Negro Bowl, held at Hampton University, one of his many announcements of future projects was that he was going to moderate presidential debates on issues pertaining to Black America. The forums, held at Howard and Morgan State, for the Democrats and Republicans, respectively, will be aired primetime on PBS later this year.  Now, when you have a PBS hookup, you use it, right? But what gives the non-journalist Smiley the right to decide how the next president of these United States will address the concerns of Black America?

I guess some would answer, “The Covenant With Black America” and the new companion, “The Covenant in Action,” gives him that right. Okay, perhaps.  Maybe Smiley’s tactic—to be Larry King and Martin Luther King simultaneously—has its perks.

But it almost seems that, with these books and televised forums, Smiley seems to have (earned) a little bit too much power to frame the range of national (televised) debate within Black America.

What’s wrong with that?

Well, to start with, Smiley’s brand of pragmatic, televised liberalism leaves out many, many people who are committed to struggle but who are not “establishment” figures. Where were the political activists strongly to the left of Jesse Jackson this year, like Harry Belafonte or someone from the Nation of Islam? Would their talk of revolution not be camera-ready, or was there room for only one Black agenda the year the corporate sponsors were a visible part of the program?

Second, and perhaps more importantly, Smiley’s activism keeps pointing to the individual. That’s a cop-out on a grand scale. Individual Blacks don’t have the access to political, social and economic resources to fight the power; activist organizations and foundations do. Smiley, a millionaire, has never called for the forming of an activist organization. Why? Would that upset Wal-Mart, the corporate sponsor of his television show?

Remember the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee? Its members went throughout the Deep South, alone, often with no cameras or microphones following them. They absorbed most of the racist terror of Jim Crow, telling the people: “We’ll help you organize, but don’t worry; we’ll also be your buffer between you and the white folks oppressing you.” SNCC leaders Diane Nash and John Lewis, for example, didn’t tell the people, “Here’s a book; it’s up to you.” They took full responsibility for the struggle. But then again, they weren’t marketers; they weren’t trying to create and maintain their brand names. They were willing to sacrifice everything, including their lives, to defeat white supremacy. Yeah, yeah, I know: that was a looong time ago.

I’m not hating—much. Again, I have great regard for Smiley and what he’s done for our people. Heck, my doctoral dissertation proudly documents his great accomplishments in media. And the Negro Bowl is the closest thing we have to a televised Black think-tank.

But the closer I watch, the more it seems like he’s created some sort of Black intellectual church that he’s pastoring—one without a deacon board to either keep him in line or to push him to the heights to which he keeps referring. It’s almost as if he’s a progressive version of Oprah—someone who’s drawing the lines of debate in order to “keep everyone feeling energized and “empowered.” Meanwhile, those with real power in America, comfortable with the idea that we won’t do anything even remotely radical to upturn their apple carts, continue using their resources to attack us every chance they get.

In the afternoon session, psychologist Dr. Julia Hare warned the thousands in the audience to not be confused by those who would try to turn “leading Blacks” into “Black leaders.” Smiley has proven that he is a committed Black leader. But if all he’s doing is leading us to the bookstore so that Black America can do some deeply pragmatic, individual, feel-good projects, it might be time to change the channel.

How Many White Reporters Who Didn't Go To Vietnam Got To Be Famous Names Today :)

National Public Radio’s “The Diane Rehm Show” had an interesting hour today. I’m glad guest host Susan Page (easily the best Rehm substitute host) brought up the Black press. The discussion would have been much fuller if Page and/or the authors had pointed out the virtually all-white newsrooms that professionally housed these admittedly brave 1960s reporters.