The New York Amsterdam News has reported that WLIB, the flagship station of white-liberal talker Air America, may go back to its Black news-talks roots, via being a New York affiliate for Syndication One. I hope this is true. WLIB was once the information-clearinghouse for Black activists in New York City, and I’d like to see that reality return in whatever form. I miss the radio that was a mainstay of my growing up years.
Author Archives: drumsintheglobalvillage
"A Leader Is Anyone With A Following": Sharpton And Media (2 of 2)
I liked yesterday’s Sharpton-NPR dialogue so much I’ve decided to put in here, in its entirety.
———-
RENEE MONTAGNE, host:
All this week on MORNING EDITION we’ve been listening to the debate over black leadership in America. We’ve heard from a corporate CEO, Ann Fudge, NPR’s Juan Williams, and author and linguist John McWhorter.
Today we hear from one of the most high-profile members of that community, Reverend Al Sharpton. He joins us from Sharpton Studios in New York. Good morning.
Reverend AL SHARPTON (Civil Rights Activist): Good morning.
MONTAGNE: Now, you may – in fact, you are the one person in our group of speakers who would commonly be identified as a black leader in the political sense and in the traditional sense. Do you think you are?
Rev. SHARPTON: I think a leader is anyone with a following. And I think that I lead an organization with a registered membership. I’ve run for public office and have demonstrated a base following. I think in that context, I guess I am.
MONTAGNE: Now you emerged on the national stage, if you will – you made headlines during a case about two decades ago involving a young black woman, a teenager, by the name of Tawana Brawley.
Rev. SHARPTON: That’s not true. The first case that went national, that I was involved in, was the killing of Michael Griffith in Howard Beach in 1986.
MONTAGNE: And that was young white men who killed him with a baseball bat when he was biking.
Rev. SHARPTON: Right. And ran him in front of a train, that’s right.
MONTAGNE: Right.
Rev. SHARPTON: Ran him in front of a car, I’m sorry. He went to a pizzeria at Cross Bay Boulevard in Howard Beach, and they said blacks should not be in the neighborhood, chased him with a baseball bat onto the Belt Parkway. He was run over. And when his family got in touch with me, we began a series of demonstrations and we were successful in getting a special prosecutor who in turn did convict people for that death.
MONTAGNE: Why did they come to you? You were in your early 30s at the time.
Rev. SHARPTON: I had a civil rights organization that was very active and high-profile. People come to civil rights organizations because they are seeking help, one, to expose their problem, and B, to stand up and put pressure on the system for them.
I’m sure that the reason – Howard Beach 20 years later, we just had the case of Glenn Moore, who was beaten up in Howard Beach and there was just a conviction in New York on that about a month ago with Fat Nick. The reason his parents came to me, probably, is because if you look at Howard Beach, one, or Bensonhurst, or Abner Louima, or any number of cases that we got involved, we successfully put pressure on the system and got some measure of justice.
So I guess people go to people that they, one, see have a track record, and two, fill the needs of what they are looking for at the time.
MONTAGNE: Now, part of your track record, and you know it better, I would say, than anyone else, is that you’ve been charged with being everything from an ambulance chaser in terms of cases like this, to Reverend Soundbite. Why do you think that you get that sort of reaction from some people, including people in the black community, when earlier civil rights activists never seemed to get tagged with those sorts of criticisms?
Rev. SHARPTON: Well, to name one, Jesse Jackson has had best-selling books written against him, called Shakedown. Are you kidding? Jesse Jackson is…
MONTAGNE: Well, later. Later. But when he was young and coming up in the world of civil rights…
Rev. SHARPTON: No, when he was young, coming up, the first book, Barbara Reynolds, the first biography on Jesse Jackson, Barbara Reynolds, a black writer, wrote against Jesse Jackson. Not true. Martin Luther King was constantly attacked by black commentator Carl Rowan. Most civil rights leaders are never given credit until they’re dead.
The real question becomes why these guys cannot explain why victims come to us and why we have built a following and an organization that has sustained past all of them.
MONTAGNE: Why do – why do victims, as you call them, come to you?
Rev. SHARPTON: Because I think victims go to where they feel people have the expertise and the track record to do what they want. And what they want is someone to stand up for them, to command public attention on their issue, and get some justice for them. There’s always somebody that not only wasn’t involved, didn’t even support the fight. They want to sit by in some studio and give commentary on something that they know nothing about, which is why I say I don’t understand the point.
MONTAGNE: One of the points is this: there are black commentators out there who argue that some leaders delight in feeling that their followers are victims.
Rev. SHARPTON: Well, I mean, again, I don’t know the commentators, most of whom have never talked to me, and some of the people they attack. They’re trying to sell books. And let them sell books. And…
MONTAGNE: Well, well, let’s just get to it. Do you view people who would follow you, do you view part of leadership as carrying the load, if it will, for victims, or do you view it as a way of empowering people?
Rev. SHARPTON: Absolutely view it as a way of empowering people. In fact, you would not fight for them to get justice if you weren’t empowering them. And you wouldn’t do other things. I’ll give you an example. When you support, as I just finished the last two weeks fighting for Ned Lamont to get the Democratic nomination in Connecticut because he’s right on the issues against Lieberman, who was the victimization there? I mean, that’s absurd.
When we fight to stand up with Bill Cosby against what is negative in terms of the use of the music industry in our culture, and I went to FCC last year about the radio stations being used to pit one group against another in hip-hop, who’s the victimization there?
The reality is that we have fought against those in the music world and in other worlds that want to make money off the victimizing our community.
MONTAGNE: The publisher of New York’s black newspaper, the Amsterdam News, has written of you that while white media thought they were using Al Sharpton as a caricature, Al is using the media. Do you think you use the media?
Rev. SHARPTON: I think the media is part of how you address the broader body politic of this country. Media is like electricity. It could be good and light up the world or it could be bad and burn it down. So you have a media strategy in every fight you do.
Yes, I’ve always tried to have the media strategy, even when it was negative media, to put light on situations that would not have gotten light. Sometimes that means they’re going to burn you, and they’re going to distort you and attack you. But your job is to get the attention.
MONTAGNE: Last question, Reverend Sharpton. What do you think will be the legacy of your leadership?
Rev. SHARPTON: I hope the legacy will be that in the latter part of the 20th century and the first part of the 21st century, when many people felt that the human rights and the civil rights struggle was waning, that there were those soldiers that stayed on the battlefield to fight to preserve voter rights and civil rights and to fight against unjust wars, and Al Sharpton was one of the soldiers that stayed on the field.
They will not say – they cannot say I was a perfect man. They cannot say that I was a flawless man. They may not even say that I was a good man. But they can say, he was on the battlefield. He fought in his day, in his generation. And those that were before him, he tried to live up to their expectations. That’s all.
MONTAGNE: Thank you for joining us.
Rev. SHARPTON: Thank you.
MONTAGNE: The Reverend Al Sharpton is an activist based in New York.
You can hear equally vehement opinions about the state and nature of black leadership on our Web site. CEO Ann Fudge, Mayor Corey Booker and other guests in our series are at npr.org.
Real Leaders Have Followers, Not (Just) Readers, Listeners And Viewers: Sharpton And Media (1 of 2)
The man I call “Rev. 911,” Alfred Sharpton, did a good job this morning on National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition.†He succinctly explained the difference between him and the others NPR interviewed this week in what the show called a “Debate On Black Leadership:†A leader, said Sharpton, “is anyone with a following.”
I’m not sure on how much of a “debate†it was; it seemed an interesting way to help NPR’s Juan Williams hawk his brand-new book “Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America—and What We Can Do About It.†Williams definitely suffers from double-consciousness: he defends Black people well on “Fox News Sunday,†and he writes very good books on the Civil Rights Movement, Thurgood Marshall and historically Black colleges and universities, but has long had a problem with the other side of Black politics and culture—Black nationalism, Pan-Africanism, and the like. I grudgingly admit that Williams does not have to pass any Black Leftist Activist Test of mine in order to write and speak about, and for, Black America. But Williams, who has regular access to America’s most prestigious mikes (and, coincidentally, 🙂 has no BLACK following that I’ve been able to see or find!), seems to want us to be “respectableâ€â€”to embrace the American flag and stop complaining. Fair enough—on the latter. Â
I’m not going to re-hash the NPR series; you can listen to it here and make up your own mind. I just wanted to point out that Sharpton, unlike most Black pundits (and those interviewed for the series), actually has a history of confronting The Powers That Be for other people. Sharpton is far from a saint; I covered him in a Jersey City police-shooting-of-person-of-color case back in the early 1990s, and the slickness didn’t come from just the perm. But if I ever got in trouble, I know who I’d call.Â
Now, if you want to hear a real NPR commentary on the state of Black leadership, check this out from the first incarnation of “The Tavis Smiley Show,” from 2004. It made me remember what I discovered when I went to a Harlem event with Sharpton back in 1991 or so–that Rev is just trying to fit into Adam Clayton Powell’s clothes. Whatever you think of that idea, perhaps that’s better than supposedly trying to chart the course of a people without their consent–or even agreement.
Saying It's A Satire Makes Sexism Okay? (UPDATE)
Here’s the statement from Lisa Fager of Industry Ears.
Viacom’s MTV continues to justify the exploitation of African American women by hiding behind words like “satire” and “parody”. The animated portrayal of two African American women scurrying on all fours with leashes around their necks, defecating on a pet shop floor goes far beyond the pale of acceptability. It is not art; it is an assault. The justification given by stating that one of the animated dogs points out his disgust by saying, “I find this a bit degrading and I’m a dog” does not eliminate the harm.Actually, the point is countered by the other dog who states, “Are you joking? What’s cooler than a two-legger who treats other two-leggers like four-leggers?” This statement emphasizes and reinforces – as tolerable behavior – the treatment of black women as dogs.
The fact that Viacom’s MTV chose to air this program on Saturday afternoons just in time for children to tune in after their morning dose of cartoons, demonstrates their complete disregard for the impact these images have on furthering both racist and misogynistic attitudes. “Where My Dogs At?” is symptomatic of what appears to be a programming strategy that is aimed at attracting an audience by portraying African American women and communities in the most degrading, confrontational manner imaginable. These images are harmful in our society and promote the racist stereotypes of black women as nothing better than dogs. The impact on children and young people is even more relevant because internalization of these images can inhibit the development of a healthy self-concept. It is indeed our right and our duty to teach our children that such negative depictions are not acceptable. There is no place in our society for images that repeatedly and continually cast African Americans in images that are reminiscent of the darkest hours of this nation’s past.
We call on responsible corporate citizens to condemn the airing of this program and any program that propagates harmful, racist stereotypes and misogynistic images. We think this is wrong and we respectfully ask the President of MTV, Christina Norman, as well as other Viacom executives to
rethink the manner in which they depict African Americans and women. We urge all concerned individuals and organizations to email Christina Norman ( Christina.Norman@mtv.com ) and their local cable providers to demand the removal of “Where My Dogs At?” and any other program that exploits African Americans and women.Â
About Industry Ears
Established in 2004, Industry Ears (IE) is a new generation think-tank focused on media’s impact on children and communities of color. IE is dedicated to addressing and finding solutions to negative and harmful content through media education, research, advocacy, public policy and continuous dialogue with industry stakeholders.
Saying It's A Satire Makes Sexism Okay?
I’m going to try to get Lisa Fager’s full statement on this, so stay tuned.Â
MTV2 faces decisions on ‘degrading’ cartoon
Episode of ‘Where My Dogs At?’ showed black women leashed, on all foursÂ
MSNBC News Services
Updated: 12:19 a.m. ET Aug 10, 2006
The MTV2 network said it had not decided whether it will ever again air a cartoon criticized as offensive for depicting women being led around on leashes.
It’s also not certain whether the series, “Where My Dogs At?†will come back for a second season, spokesman Jeff Castaneda said Wednesday. Its first season ended during the last week of July.
One episode, aired in the early afternoon, featured an appearance by a cartoon Snoop Dogg accompanied by two women in neck collars and chains. MTV2 said the episode was a satire of an actual Snoop appearance where women were in collars and chains.

“We certainly do not condone Snoop’s actions and the goal was to take aim at that incident for its insensitivity and outrageousness,†Castaneda said. “Even one of the dogs, a main character on the show, states, ‘I find that degrading and I am a dog.â€â€™
The cartoon has drawn fire from several prominent African Americans who call the episode degrading.
Critics say MTV2 showed especially poor judgment because the weekly animated program, “Where My Dogs At?â€, appeals to young teens and airs at an hour, 12:30 p.m. on Saturdays, when many children are watching television.
A statement released this week by the Viacom Inc.-owned cable network, whose president, Christina Norman, is black, defended the episode in question as social satire.
In it, a look-alike of rap star Snoop Dogg strolls into a pet shop with two bikini-clad black women on leashes. They hunch over on all fours and scratch themselves as he orders one of them to “hand me my latte.†At the end of the segment, the Snoopathon Dogg Esquire character dons a rubber glove to clean up excrement left on the floor by one of the women.
MTV2 said the “Woofie Loves Snoop†episode first aired on July 1.
Several prominent blacks, including New York Daily News columnist Stanley Crouch, condemned the segment as misogynist, racist and crude, and they questioned the sincerity of MTV’s contention that it was satirizing the outlandish behavior of a real-life rapper.
“Where’s the context in that?†said Lisa Fager, president and co-founder of Industry Ears, a consortium of broadcast industry professionals who monitor and critique media content.
Crouch suggested in a column this week that the “Where My Dogs At?†segment was an extension of dehumanizing images contained in gangsta rap videos aired by MTV and projected â€around the world as ’real’ black culture.â€
Payne Brown, a high-ranking executive at cable giant Comcast Corp., said he lodged a personal complaint in an e-mail to Norman but found her response, essentially the same as the network’s press statement, to be “unsatisfying.â€
“Clearly, it goes far beyond the pale of anything that remotely could be considered acceptable,†he said of the episode, stressing that he was not speaking for Comcast. “This is just me as an African-American father, husband and son.â€
The first season of the show, which carries a rating advising that parents may find its material unsuitable for children under age 14, drew a cumulative audience of 17.2 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.
Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
Philadelphia Freedom
was what I enjoyed yesterday. My good friends Michael Schiffmann and Linn Washington were around. While Michael showed me the cover of his new book, I was introduced to some GREAT individuals from London who just happened to be documentary filmmakers. As the anchors say on the Tee Vee news, “More on this as it develops.” Meanwhile, you might be interested in this.
Prometheus Unbound
Got my newsletter in the mail yesterday. Regardless of the European name, the Prometheus Radio Project is doing Shango’s work. 🙂 The project is an activist group attempting to provide the world’s voiceless and informationally disenfranchised with low-power radio stations. I was very impressed with its presentation when I first learned about the project at a Washington, D.C. meeting of Consumers Union earlier this year. If I return to Howard University this fall, I plan on using the DVD the project’s leaders were kind enough to give me. It showed the project and a small group in Tanzania jointly create such a station for a particular community. Helping people to find their voices and to informationally control their communities—particularly in the African World—is vitally important work in the Information Age.
Two Self-Explanatory NYT Articles
So let’s get to ’em:
————-
Agony of New Orleans, Through Spike Lee’s Eyes
The film, which Mr. Lee directed and produced, comes 20 years after the August 1986 debut of his first hit, “She’s Gotta Have It,†about Nola Darling, a Brooklyn graphic artist, and her three lovers. The provocative films that followed (“Do the Right Thing,†“Jungle Fever,†“Malcolm X,†among others), with their searing cultural critiques, cemented Mr. Lee’s reputation as his generation’s pioneering black filmmaker. This year he had a commercial and critical success with “Inside Man,†about a bank heist.
Like him or not, Mr. Lee, 49, is an artist many people feel they know. People, black and white, approached him and the “Levees†crew here, he said, imploring: “Tell the story. Tell the story.†“It becomes like an obligation we have,†he said.
Mr. Lee’s reputation helped get his camera crew into the city’s water-soaked homes, he said. It allowed him to stretch out a complex story, with themes of race, class and politics that, he said, have too often been sensationalized or rendered in sound bites. He received permission, for example, from Kimberly Polk to film the funeral of her 5-year-old daughter, Sarena Polk, swept away when the waters ravaged the Lower Ninth Ward. “She came to me in a dream,†Ms. Polk says in the film. “She said, ‘Mama, I’m falling.’ â€
“Levees†opens with the Louis Armstrong song “Do You Know What It Means to Miss New Orleans?†and offers black-and-white images of the city’s Southern-with-a-twist past — Mardi Gras, Confederate flags — interspersed with scenes of children airlifted from demolished houses, a door marked “dead body inside.â€
This gumbo of a film lingers on the politics of disaster response, the science of levees and storms, the city’s Creolized culture, the stories of loss. Many faces are familiar: politicians like C. Ray Nagin, the city’s mayor, and Kathleen Blanco, the governor of Louisiana; celebrities like Harry Belafonte, Kanye West, the Rev. Al Sharpton and Sean Penn; and the native son and trumpeter Wynton Marsalis, who talks about New Orleans as the birthplace of jazz. “It’s like somebody violating your mama,†Mr. Marsalis says of the flooding.
Mr. Lee said he intended most of the “Levee†stories to come from the ordinary people who endured the Superdome’s makeshift shelter or long searches for loved ones. So “Levees†includes many people like Phyllis Montana LeBlanc, depressed and outraged after her family was evacuated to different places around the country and she waited four months for a government trailer. “Not just the levees broke,†she says in the film. “The spirit broke.â€
And there’s Paris Ervin, a University of New Orleans student, who fled Hurricane Katrina but left behind his mother, Mary Johnell Morant. Months later, after their home was officially searched and marked empty, the police found Ms. Morant’s remains in the kitchen, under a refrigerator. It took two more months for the coroner’s office to identify her officially and release the body.
As a kind of thank-you to the many residents like Mr. Ervin, the first half of “Levees†will be first shown free on Aug. 16 to 10,000 people at the New Orleans Arena. HBO is to show the first two hours of “Levees†on Aug. 21 at 9 p.m., the last two on Aug. 22 at 9 p.m. It will be shown in its entirety at 8 p.m. on Aug. 29, the anniversary of the hurricane, one of the country’s worst natural disasters.
The critics and audience will have the final say on whether “Levees†is the thorough examination that Mr. Lee intends. His views are clear. “What happened in New Orleans was a criminal act,†he said, a tragic backhanded slap to poor, black or politically insignificant people. “The levees were a Band-Aid here and a Band-Aid there. In the famous statement of Malcolm X, the chickens came home to roost. Somebody needs to go to jail.â€
Douglas Brinkley, the author of “The Great Deluge,†a book about Hurricane Katrina said: “When I heard Spike Lee was coming down, I felt grateful. I thought the media perspective — while good — still showed that a lot wasn’t being asked.†Mr. Lee is “grappling with the larger question of why so many African-Americans distrust government,†said Mr. Brinkley, a professor of history at Tulane University, who appears in the film.
Just as Michael Apted’s “7 Up,†documentary series followed a group of people, filmed first as children, Mr. Lee said he hopes to return to the people profiled in “Levees.â€
One 90-degree Saturday, some of those interviewed gathered in a big meeting room at the Courtyard Marriott Hotel, not far from the Convention Center. Each person was photographed within a frame, intended to convey the idea that each interview is a portrait.
“It’s really just a mood,†Cliff Charles, the cinematographer on “Levees,†said of what he was trying to capture in the various portraits.
“Levees†has no voice-over narration and is stitched together by the witnesses and commentators. Sam Pollard, the producer and supervising editor, said they had made 30 or so versions of the documentary, wading through hours of film for the moments and the elements that best tell the story.
Mr. Pollard, who like Mr. Charles is black, has worked with Mr. Lee on two other documentaries, “4 Little Girls,†about the girls killed in the bombing of a black church in Birmingham in 1963, and “Jim Brown: All American,†about the former pro football star. Mr. Pollard said Mr. Lee came up with the film’s title last year, before they started shooting.
On the set Mr. Lee asked all the questions from a typed list. (“You have to say the question in the answer,†he said to those he interviewed. “Don’t look at me, keep looking at the lenses.â€)
The interview lineup on that day in May included Joseph Bruno, a lawyer, talking about the complexities of flood insurance, among other topics; the musician Terence Blanchard (who also did the score for the film); Calvin Mackie, a mechanical engineer; Brian Thevenot and Trymaine Lee (who had Mr. Lee autograph his videos), reporters from The New Orleans Times-Picayune; and Mr. Brinkley.
Mr. Lee’s direction was terse, although he is more soft-spoken than his public image suggests. He told Mr. Mackie, whose father had lung cancer and was supposed to start chemotherapy the day the hurricane hit: “Talk about your father and stepmother. Say their names too.â€
Mr. Mackie, 38, a professor of engineering at Tulane, was mourning their deaths. His 43-year-old stepmother Linda Emery Mackie’s breast cancer had metastasized in the weeks after the hurricane. His 63-year-old father Willie Mackie’s cancer treatment was delayed for six weeks, his health records lost. They died days apart in March.
“I hope that the documentary opens America’s eyes to how we continue to struggle here,†Mr. Mackie, who is black, said after his on-camera interview. “No matter how you feel about Spike, and I don’t like all his movies, people know about his integrity and his unrelenting commitment to African-American people, to tell our stories. You talk about street credibility, well, he has a cultural credibility.â€
“Levees†started out as a two-hour, $1 million film. HBO executives looking for a Hurricane Katrina project snapped it up. Mr. Lee and his crew were able to get into New Orleans after Thanksgiving, Mr. Lee said, and he quickly realized that he needed two more hours and $1 million more to give the story a full airing. He got it.
Sheila Nevins, the film’s executive producer and the president of the documentary and family division at HBO, said “Levees†was an easy sell, at both prices.
“I realized this would be the film of record,†she said. “When Spike interviews a forgotten American whose kid floated away in the water, he lets them raise up their poetry. They’re able to express to him what they’re not able to express to anyone else.â€
With all those hours of conversations and interviews, he certainly ended up with themes that went beyond the floodwaters, Mr. Lee said.
“Politics. Ethics. Morals,†he said, when asked what Katrina and in turn “Levees†was really about. “This is about what this country is really going to be.â€
An Image Popular in Films Raises Some Eyebrows in Ads
Her onscreen presence takes on many variations, but she is easily recognizable by a few defining traits. Other than her size, she is almost always black. She typically finds herself in an exchange that is either confrontational or embarrassing. And her best line is often little more than a sassy “Mmmm hmmm.â€
This caricature, playing on stereotypes of heavy black women as boisterous and sometimes aggressive, has been showing up for some time in stand-up comedy routines and in movies like “Big Momma’s House’’ and “Diary of a Mad Black Woman.’’ Often, the pieces are produced by directors and writers who are black themselves.
With black creators giving more acceptability to the image, it is now starting to appear more often in television commercials as well. Most recently some variation of this character has appeared in commercials for Dairy Queen, Universal Studios and Captain Morgan rum.
But despite the popularity of such characters among blacks, the use of the image of big black women as the target of so many jokes is troublesome to some marketers and media scholars.
“It is perpetuating a stereotype that black females are strong, aggressive, controlling people,’’ said Tommy E. Whittler, a marketing professor at DePaul University. “I don’t think you want to do that.’’
To be sure, sassy overweight black women appear to represent only a small fraction of the African-American actresses who appear in commercials. Marketers have made strides in recent years toward making advertisements with a more diverse cast of characters.
Blacks regularly appear in commercials selling products as diverse as toothpaste, credit cards and erectile dysfunction medication. Indeed, according to several academic studies, over the last 15 years the number of blacks appearing in commercials has been roughly proportional to their share of the American population, about 14 percent.
“Over the years it’s evolved,’’ said Fay Ferguson, co-chief executive of Burrell Communications, an advertising agency that specializes in marketing toward black consumers. “We’ve come a long way in how we see black women in advertising.’’
Stereotypical portrayals of blacks in commercials have drawn criticism from civil rights groups for decades. Some of the earliest and most iconic examples of blacks in advertising — Rastus the Cream of Wheat chef, Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben — showed blacks in subservient roles that recalled the days of slavery.
Those images have been toned down over the years (Aunt Jemima’s red bandanna, for example, was replaced with pearl earrings and a lace collar in 1989) and are no longer as overtly stereotypical as they once were. And now there are many examples of blacks presented in middle-class settings and engaged in mainstream activities.
To some, the freer use of overweight black women in comic situations suggests a welcome change that reflects a broader acceptability of blacks in the media. But others find the recurring use of the image a return to a disturbing past.
And some say these images may serve to exacerbate misunderstanding between whites and blacks.
“Not only are we being given images of who we are supposed to be, but others are also formulating their images of us based on that,†said Marilyn Kern Foxworth, an author and marketing expert who studies how blacks are portrayed in advertising. “People have already determined who we are and how we’re going to react in certain situations.â€
The heavy black female makes one of her latest appearances in a commercial for the Dairy Queen Blizzard. In the spot, a man boarding an airplane sets his ice cream shake down so he can load his bag into an overhead compartment. As he reaches up, another passenger on the plane starts eating the Blizzard. Seeing this, the first man lets go of his bag so he can reclaim his Blizzard and inadvertently drops his luggage on another passenger’s head.
That unlucky passenger happens to be an overweight black woman who lets out an irritated gasp that reminds all the passengers around her who not to mess with.
Rick Cusato, executive vice president for Grey Worldwide, the firm that wrote the campaign for Dairy Queen, said the script was not written with a black actress in mind.
“We basically cast the funniest person,†he said. “We didn’t specifically cast for a black woman. We said, ‘Wow, she’s really funny.’ And she happened to be black.â€
Another new Dairy Queen commercial features a similar character — played by the same actress — working as an airport security screener. When a man tries to walk through a metal detector eating a Dairy Queen burger, her eyes dart disapprovingly downward at him. Then she barks, “Uh, uh. Get on!†directing him to walk through again.
Michael Keller, Dairy Queen’s chief brand officer, said the company considered actors of all sizes and races before making a decision. “We looked at male body builders, really big tall women. We looked at just about everybody we could,†he said. “She projected an image that was everything we wanted it to be. This is just a strong woman being herself.†He added that the company had not received any complaints about the ads being racially insensitive. But to some these images are troubling.
“It’s not an accident that she’s African-American and heavy,†said Howard Buford, founder and chief executive of Prime Access, an advertising agency that creates commercials marketed toward minority audiences. “There’s certainly a long heritage of large African-American women who are kind of sassy and feisty and humorously angry. There’s a sense that this whole value system is O.K. again.â€
Large black actresses have had recurring roles in commercials over the years, and often are cast in roles where their aggressiveness is a defining trait. The heavy black spokeswoman for Pine Sol was one of the first to embrace the role. Her aggression was aimed at household dirt, however, not people. In a recent commercial for Captain Morgan rum, a large black woman berates her man for playing dominoes and making her late.
In one recent Twix commercial, a full-figured black woman asks her boyfriend if her pants make her rear end look big. As the camera focuses on her plump backside (exaggerated by the camera for effect), the man stuffs his face with a Twix bar and mumbles an indecipherable answer.
Pleased with his response, the woman walks away. She is not shown being aggressive or loud, but the commercial leaves the impression that if the man had given the wrong answer, she might have erupted.
A series of Universal Studios commercials star a heavy black woman who is accompanying her children on a Jurassic Park ride. Frightened by the ride, she roars and buries the heads of her two young children in her bosom.
Black advertising executives have noticed the stereotype.
“There’s an image out there of black women being boisterous, overbearing, controlling and extremely aggressive in their behavior,†said Carol H. Williams, who runs her own advertising firm in Oakland, Calif., that specializes in marketing toward blacks. “I really don’t know why that stereotype is laughed at.â€
Some have trouble with the new commercial images in part because they are being created by white writers.
“There are images of African-Americans created for white people by white people and there are images of African-Americans created for African-Americans,’’ Mr. Buford said. “And there’s a big difference.â€
The lack of diversity on Madison Avenue has been a long-standing issue. In fact, the New York City Commission on Human Rights is investigating the hiring practices of advertising agencies in the city and is looking at how they have approached employing blacks.
Jannette L. Dates, dean of the communications school at Howard University, said that while whites and blacks could watch the same portrayal of a large black woman on television and laugh, they are laughing for different reasons.
Some whites, Ms. Dates said, may laugh thinking, “Wow, she’s so ridiculous. My people aren’t like that.†She added: “They wouldn’t consciously feel that way. But there is something going on subconsciously because that’s what advertising is all about. They’re trying to tap into some feeling, some emotion, some psychological hang-up.â€
Blacks, meanwhile, might laugh because they can identify with the character, Ms. Dates said. “It’s for both the people who want to snicker and say, ‘See, that’s how they are.’ And for people to say, ‘There’s one of us.’ â€
Orlando Patterson, a sociology professor at Harvard, amplified that point. “To the black audience, this may be, ‘You do your thing, sister,’ †Professor Patterson said. “The white audience is laughing with her. Then they go back to reality, and they laugh at her.â€
But Liz Gumbinner, a creative director at David and Goliath, the agency that developed the Universal campaign, said the broad appeal of the commercials was proof they were not insensitively playing on racial stereotypes.
Noting that a black woman in a recent David and Goliath focus group spoke up about how much she liked the Universal ads, Ms. Gumbinner said: “I wonder if sometimes when you have somebody that is less conventional, they become the most memorable. We use a lot of bald men, and it’s not like we have it out for bald men.â€
Ms. Gumbinner and Mr. Cusato of Grey Advertising, however, said no black writers were involved in either of their campaigns.
As is typically the case with racial stereotypes, who is laughing and why is complex and potentially inflammatory. Black actors and comedians have profited handsomely from creating bumptious female characters on TV and in movies, raising the issue of whether they, too, are perpetuating the stereotypes that many find offensive.
Tyler Perry, the filmmaker and actor, created a series of plays and movies, including the huge hit “Diary of a Mad Black Woman,†in which the main character Mable (Madea) Simmons is a no-nonsense overweight matriarch. Mo’Nique, a full-figured comedian, has built a routine on being outlandish, brash and, at times, downright crude.
Mr. Buford, of Prime Access, said part of what makes the comedy of Mr. Perry and Mo’Nique acceptable is that it is written from a personal experience common to many blacks.
“Authenticity makes a lot of difference,†he said. “It’s authenticity born of having lived that life versus having been cast in that role.â€
Black Media Self-Determination, Exhibit A
Good news is always welcomed here. So here’s some.
————-
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20060803/lead/lead4.html
Â
Region tunes in to CaribVision
Â
published: Thursday | August 3, 2006
BRIDGETOWN, Barbados, CMC: The Caribbean Community’s (CARICOM) lead Prime Minister for the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME), Owen Arthur, has fully embraced CaribVision, describing it as the region’s very “own” television station.
Â
Delivering the keynote address at Tuesday’s official launch of the channel by the Caribbean Media Corporation (CMC), Arthur complained about cultural penetration and foreign domination of the media messages and the industry as a whole in the Caribbean.
“We might indeed be one people but we surely are better informed about the affairs of others and know more about others elsewhere in the world than we know about our own right here in the Caribbean,” he said.
The Barbados Prime Minister noted the Caribbean enjoyed a rich cultural heritage but further lamented that “our senses have by and large been shielded from enjoying this rich heritage, while we have been inundated by cultural imports, which sadly, have largely promoted gratuitous violence, amoral lifestyles, a profound disregard for good literature, among their most imposing effects.”
Â
Caribbean artistes
He also complained about exploitation of Caribbean artistes by foreign media entities in pursuit of profit.
It was in this context that he welcomed the launch of CaribVision, which will be beamed directly from the Caribbean to the people of the region and the Caribbean Diaspora.
CMC’s Chairman Darcy Boyce noted that demand for the Caribbean product internationally was growing and that more Caribbean companies were becoming pan-Caribbean in orientation.
“Clearly, a media house with reach throughout the Caribbean is now necessary. Beyond that, such a media house must be able to carry its product into the international markets where there is an interest in and demand for Caribbean media content. No other media house is creating a Caribbean media space in the same way as CaribVision,” Boyce said.
Â
CaribVision facts
CaribVision is a cooperative venture between CMC, regional and U.S. partners.
These include CBC of Barbados; TV6 of Trinidad and Tobago; CVM, TVJ and CPTC of Jamaica; ICRT, Cuba; ZNS, Bahamas; SoundView Broadcasting of New York and many independent producers around the region.
The channel is currently aired in Antigua, Anguilla, Barbados, Cayman Islands, Dominica, St. Eustatius, U.S. Virgin Islands, the British Virgin Islands and St Vincent and the Grenadines.
My Summer With Taylor Branch
Finally. All 2,000 pages read of the three-volume King biography/Civil Rights Movement narrative history. Just finished “At Canaan’s Edge” last night, in between gorging myself on that day-long Marx Brothers marathon on TCMÂ yesterday. 🙂
Clearly this trilogy is supposed to be The Final Word on King and The Movement. As far as the often-trod history of 1955 to 1968 is concerned, it succeeds. Branch said his goal was to make narrative history and biography reinforce each other, and it’s clear he took 25 years to do that that well.
Verdict: Collectively, it’s a masterful narrative that weaves in out of the lives of several characters. (Don’t want to read a King biography AND the main books on SNCC and its leaders AND Robert A. Caro’s tomes on Johnson? Okay, then read these 2,000 pages and you’ll be straight.) My only issue with it is that it is a typical white liberal telling of a Great King who tried to save the world of its sins by forgiving whites of their racism. Branch wraps King in the American flag instead of the tradition of Black struggle. Black nationalism? Not a legitimate ideology with a long history, according to Branch’s omissions; it was just an outgrowth of disappointment with the pain that Blacks went through. The author takes pains to show the struggles and sacrifices of whites and Blacks to destroy second-class citizenship, and, to his credit, he does not flinch from showing white racist violence. The trilogy allows you to follow The Movement from the point of view of FBI head J. Edgar Hoover (whose actions against King Branch portrays as minor (!)) and Johnson as well as Malcolm X and several grassroots activists. I’m glad that there are so many other books with other perspectives, because I think (and hope) that the ideology behind Branch’s well-meaning narrative has run its course.