Who's New? (The Latest "Doctor Who" Companion)

Freema Agyeman

If you’re in the U.K., you’ll be watching the new season that starts Saturday. A little history of sorts will be made.

Here are some trailers. And here’s some video interviews.

Added on April 2: Saw the season premiere online today. She was GREAT. Here’s a clip. Enjoy it while it lasts on “you”-know-where.  🙂

The Problem With African Heritage Month……….

 

………is not that it’s only a month (people who complain about it should respect its history), but that, like its sibling, MLK Day, the Establishment uses it as a way to instill some innocuous pride instead of directly confronting the ugly side of American history.

A Wreath for Emmett Till (Boston Globe-Horn Book Honors (Awards))

Check out this “News And Notes” story and subsequent interview. And here’s the newspaper account that spurred NPR’s interest.

So, children in 2007 L.A. who grow up with all kinds of rap lyrics can’t handle the Till story? PUL-LEASE.   🙂

BREAKING NEWS: 3rd Circuit Appeals Court Sets May 17 Date for Oral Arguments in Mumia Case

 

Once again, Dave is on point and in front of the herd. I’ve enclosed the open letter from Mumia’s lead attorney at the end of this posting.

March 23, 2007

Third Circuit Appeals Court Sets Date for Oral Arguments in Mumia Case

By Dave Lindorff

Mumia Abu-Jamal, the Philadelpia journalist and former Black Panther activist who has been on Pennsylvania’s death row since 1982, will finally have his appeal of his conviction heard by a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which set a date of May 17.

At that session, Abu-Jamal will argue that his original trial for the 1981 murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner was fatally flawed because of racial bias by the prosecutor in jury selection. He will argue that his conviction by that jury was improper because the prosecutor improperly was permitted to lessen jurors’ sense of responsibility by assuring them that whatever they decided, the defendant would get “appeal after appeal” and so their decision “would not be final.” He will also argue that his effort to appeal his conviction was damaged because his post-conviction relief act hearing was presided over by a judge who was clearly biased in favor of the district attorney.

The hearing will also hear a claim by the district attorney that Abu-Jamal’s death sentence—lifted by a Federal Judge in 2001—should be reinstated. The federal district court had ruled that Abu-Jamal’s sentence had been arrived at by a jury that was given improper and confusing instructions by Judge Albert Sabo, and that their sentencing form itself was
misleading.

Meanwhile, it has been learned that the Philadelphia District Attorneys Office earlier this month attempted
unsuccessfully to have the entire Third Circuit Court—one of the more liberal appeals courts in the nation—recused from hearing Abu-Jamal’s appeal on the grounds that Abu-Jamal’s claim of jury selection bias was charging then DA Ed Rendell (now Pennsylvania’s governor), with having deliberately violated the law. Rendel’s wife, Marjorie, is one of the appeals court judges in the Third Circuit.

Abu-Jamal’s attorney Robert R. Bryan, objecting to the DA’s effort, noted that there was no claim of illegality on the governor’s part, but rather on the part of the prosecutor in the case, Joseph McGill. It is alleged that a succession of Philadelphia DA’s encouraged their prosecutors to remove as many blacks as possible from capital juries, and documentary evidence has been submitted to show that this was done, both by the DA’s office over all, and by assistant DA McGill in his own capital cases. During jury selection for Abu-Jamal’s trial, 11 black potential jurors who had all agreed they
could vote for a death penalty, were removed by McGill using his available peremptory challenges (meaning he did not have to give a reason for his action).

In a letter to the DA’s office stating that the request to have all the circuit’s judges recused from hearing the case had been rejected, the clerk of the court said that such a request would have to be made not as a letter, but in the form of a formal motion. In a scolding tone, the letter notes that such a motion “must be in proper form, i.e. an original and three copies and certificate of service.”

“It must have been humiliating for the opposition” to receive such a note, comments attorney Bryan. He notes that to date, the DA has “not had the guts” to make such a formal motion, adding, “We’ll see.”

Authors Website: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net

Authors Bio: Dave Lindorff, a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books (“This Can’t Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy” and “Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal”). His latest book, coauthored with Barbara Olshanshky, is “The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office” (St. Martin’s Press, May 2006). His writing is available at
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net .

———–

March 22, 2007
Legal Update

Re: Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Martin Horn, Pennsylvania Director of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals Nos. 0 1-90 14,02-900 1 (death penalty)

Dear Friends:

Today notification was received that oral argument in the case of my client, Mumia Abu-Jamal, is scheduled on Thursday, May 17, 9:30 am, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Ceremonial Courtroom, 1″ Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 6″‘ and Market Streets, Philadelphia. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., and the National Lawyers Guild, which have filed amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs, are also participating.

This case concerns Mr. Abu-Jamal’s right to a fair trial, the struggle against the death penalty, and the political repression of an outspoken journalist. Racism and politics are threads that have run through this case since his 1981 arrest. The complex issues under consideration, which are of great constitutional significance, include:

Whether Mr. Abu-Jamal was denied the right to due process of law and a fair trial under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments because of the prosecutor’s “appeal-after-appeal” argument which encouraged the jury to disregard the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt, and err on the side of guilt.

Whether the prosecution’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude African Americans from sitting on the jury violated Mr. Abu-Jamal’s rights to due process and equal protection of the law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, and contravened Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).

Whether the jury instructions and verdict form that resulted in the death penalty deprived Mr. Abu- Jamal of rights guaranteed by the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments to due process of law, equal protection of the law, and not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, and violated Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988), since the judge precluded the jurors from considering any mitigating evidence unless they all agreed on the existence of a particular circumstance.

Whether Mr. Abu-Jamal was denied due process and equal protection of the law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments during post-conviction hearings as the result of the bias and racism of Judge Albert F. Sabo which included the comment that he was “going to help’em fry the ni – – er”.

Recently the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office sent a letter to the court suggesting that the entire Third Circuit should disqualify itself from deciding the case of my client. We filed a reply strongly objecting to this absurd request, explaining that the position of opposing counsel was “utterly unfounded and should be rejected.” On March 10 the court rebuked the prosecution, advising that it had failed to follow proper procedure and thus no action would be taken.

Professor Judith L. Ritter, associate counsel, and I are in this case to win a new and fair trial for Mr. Abu-Jamal. The goal is for our client to be free. Nevertheless, he remains in great danger. If all is lost, he will be executed. Your interest in this struggle for human rights and against the death penalty is appreciated.

Yours very truly,
Robert R. Bryan
Lead counsel for Mumia Abu-Jamal

Congrats To………..

 

………my colleague Roland S. Martin, who has just joined CNN.

Here’s one of the official releases:

News Release
Contact:  Danielle Robinson
March 13, 2007
312 226 5552

10:30 a.m. ET

Host/Columnist/Author/Journalist Roland S. Martin Joins CNN    

Roland S. Martin, a nationally syndicated columnist and Chicago-based radio host, will join CNN/U.S as a contributor and analyst for several programs and CNN will develop various other programming concepts around him in the next several months.  The appointment is effective immediately.

      “It’s a well-deserved and a fantastic opportunity for one of the country’s most unique journalists.  Roland’s multi-media story-telling presence has now expanded to cable television to an audience that should find his message most refreshing,” says Marc Watts of Signature Media Group who negotiated Mr. Martin’s new deal.  “He has become a familiar face to CNN viewers the last three years, already having appeared on numerous CNN programs and this deal solidifies a larger role for Roland.”

      A nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate, Martin most recently served as executive editor of The Chicago Defender, the nation’s largest black daily newspaper.  Some writers called Martin a “savior” of what was described as a failing newspaper. 

He is a commentator for TV One Cable Network and hosts The Roland S. Martin Show on WVON/1690AM in Chicago each weekday.  He is the author of “Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith” and “Speak, Brother!  A Black Man’s View of America.”

      As an analyst, Martin provides news reports for American Urban Radio Networks and has appeared numerous times on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, Court TV, BET Nightly News, BBC News, National Public Radio, The Word Network and America’s Black Forum.

      “From President Bush to Oprah Winfrey to Charles Gibson, Roland has shown a knack for asking probing, insightful and news-making questions,” Watts said.  “Roland and I have been friends for 20 years. We first met when he was a high school student in Houston.  At the time I was a reporter for the local CBS station KHOU-TV.”

      “As a multifaceted journalist steeped in the traditions of storytelling and truth-seeking, Roland offers a powerful voice on subjects ranging from politics to religion to race to numerous other social issues,” Jon Klein, President of CNN/U.S. said. “We’re very pleased to have him contribute to a wide range of CNN stories.

      “CNN has made a sincere commitment to giving its audience a breadth of important stories not typically found in mainstream media,” Martin said. “I am pleased to be a part of that effort and to do my part to see they rise to that challenge.”

      “Roland will continue to reside in Chicago while commuting to New York to fulfill his responsibilities for CNN.  In addition to appearing on various news programs as an analyst Roland will play a key role in the development of programming concepts that compliment his style,” Watts said.

      He is the former founding news editor for Savoy magazine and the former founding editor of BlackAmericaWeb.com, owned by nationally syndicated radio host Tom Joyner and Radio One.

      Martin previously served as owner/publisher of Dallas-Fort Worth Heritage, a Christian monthly newspaper and worked as managing editor of the Houston Defender and the Dallas Weekly.  He also has worked for KRLD/1080AM, KKDA-AM in Dallas, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram and the Austin American-Statesman.

      During his journalism career, Martin has won more than 20 awards, including a regional Edward R. Murrow award from the Radio-Television News Directors Association; several first place awards from the Dallas-Fort Worth Association of Black Communicators; two citations from the National Associated Press Managing Editors Conference; the top sports reporting award in 1997 from the National Association of Black Journalists; and honors from the Houston Press Club.

      He earned a bachelor’s of science degree in journalism from Texas A&M University and is currently working on a master’s degree in Christian communications at Louisiana Baptist University.  He is a member of the National Association of Black Journalists, Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity and the American Society of Newspaper Editors.     

New Online Exhibition Opens Up 300 Years of Caribbean History

Got this from—who else?—Kalamu. 

 

New Online Exhibition Opens Up 300 Years of Caribbean History

“Caribbean Histories Revealed,” a new online exhibition from The [United Kingdom] National Archives, launches on Tuesday 6 March. The exhibition traces the history of the British Caribbean through Colonial Office records from the 17th century to 1926. From maps and photographs, to letters and petitions, it brings to life over 300 years of life in the Caribbean.

The launch of this new resource marks the culmination of “Your Caribbean Heritage,” a three-year cataloguing project at The National Archives, supported by the Heritage Lottery Fund. The project has created 125,000 new online record descriptions relating to the Caribbean, making the documents more easily accessible to a wider audience through The National Archives’ catalogue.

The online exhibition gives a historical overview of the Caribbean through a series of topics including:
        o the transatlantic slave trade
        o struggles against slavery and colonialism
        o everyday life
        o political conflicts
        o the role of West Indian soldiers in the First World War.

These topics are discussed under six themes, each illustrated by documents carefully selected among the vast amount of newly catalogued records.

The award-winning novelist Andrea Levy, best known for Small Island, says: “It is fascinating, and very gratifying, to see the historical records of the Caribbean becoming more accessible to ordinary people. The on-line exhibition makes a great starting point for anyone interested in researching this part of Britain’s heritage. I hope the archive will grow into a rich and much-used resource.”

One of the documents featured in Caribbean Histories Revealed is a letter from G. Jenner, British Minister at Bogata, expressing concern for the treatment of Caribbean workers on the Panama Canal in 1895 (National Archives File reference CO 318/284/16):

“They number upwards of 6,000 and without their assistance the Panama Canal cannot be proceeded with. Nevertheless, although I have spoken frequently on the subject, I do not see that any steps have been taken by the Central Government to secure them better treatment at the hands of the local Authorities.”

Dr Gemma Romain, researcher at The National Archives, who took part in the project said: “‘Your Caribbean Heritage’ has been an important opportunity for us to investigate a wealth of information held at The National Archives. Throughout this huge project, we have come across thousands of fascinating documents offering significant insights into the history of the Caribbean. The website, Caribbean Histories Revealed, highlights some of the most interesting documents, and is a great online resource for finding out more about this part of world history.”

To find out more visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/caribbeanhistory

Dr Gemma Romain
Research, Knowledge, and Academic Services
The National Archives
Kew
Richmond
Surrey
TW9 4DU
gemma.romain@nationalarchives.gov.uk
020 8392 5330 ext. 2271
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Your Caribbean Heritage
caribbean@nationalarchives.gov.uk

Congrats To………..

…….my friend, Hazel Trice Edney, who has been named Editor-in-Chief of the NNPA News Service, which includes BlackPressUSA.com.

Although many sisters have worked as the News Service’s Managing Editor in the 1990s and early 2000s, in terms of power over content, she may be the first woman to serve as the News Service’s EIC in the organization’s 60-plus year history.

I always said Hazel was another Ethel Payne. Now I have proof.  🙂

Did You See…….

…….Chris Rock on “The Tavis Smiley Show” joking with Tavis about Smiley’s annual “The State of The Black Union” gatherings?

I also liked Dyson’s response two days later (March 9), which I’ve posted below.

Tavis: Michael Eric Dyson is a distinguished Professor of Humanities at the University of Pennsylvania and the host of his own syndicated radio program. He is the author of a number of notable books, including one last year on Hurricane Katrina. His latest book is called “Debating Race,” a collection of memorable encounters and conversations about matters of race in America. Michael Eric Dyson, it’s always nice to see you, sir.

Michael Eric Dyson: Always good to see you, man.

Tavis: I don’t know you do it. Fourteen books in fourteen years. You’re cranking out a book every year.

Dyson: Well, you know, I’m just trying to stay on my game and trying to take the requisite time it takes to construct a book, as you know, having sold so many, to put the requisite effort into it to make sure that it’s clean and articulate and to make sure that it’s certainly representative (laughter)

Tavis: – (Laughter) That sounded sort of Biden-esque, clean and articulate.

Dyson: And who knew that, when we talk about the influence of hip-hop culture on the culture, that Joe Biden, the senator, would have been influenced by “you’re so fresh and so clean?”

Tavis: (Laughter) Now there you go. I’m glad you went there because, two nights ago on this program, Chris Rock, comedian extraordinaire –

Dyson: – yes.

Tavis: – was on this program a couple of nights ago and your name just happened to come up.

Dyson: I see.

Tavis: Would you like to see this clip?

Dyson: Yeah, with him and the woman I owe child support to (laughter).

Tavis: (Laughter) Roll the Chris Rock clip from two nights ago on this program.  

[PLAYS CLIP YOU JUST WATCHED 🙂 ]

Tavis: So what do you think of that, Mike Dyson?

Dyson: Well, you know, how you’re living, Biggie Smalls, in mansions and Benz and giving ends to my friends and it feels stupendous, tremendous cream. Blink a dollar and a dream. Well, you know what? Chris can rock it. I’m just trying to Michael Dysonize my thing, brother, you know (laughter).

Tavis: (Laughter) On a serious note, though, do you ever get concerned that your profound intellect gets taken less seriously because of your style, because of your flow, because of the way you choose to do what you do?

Dyson: Of course, but that’s the dilemma of Black culture at large.

Tavis: Right.

Dyson: The point is that, if you have style and substance merged together in a seamless package, people always question the integrity of the fusion. So what we have to do is think ahead of time. We have to think anticipatorily. We have to look toward the future like Jesus did. “One day hopefully I’m going to rise. Got to go through some death right now. It’s going to be kind of funky and fowl and nefarious, but ultimately the triumph will be mine.”

So you have to have enough confidence in your skills and abilities that God gave you that the world might catch up twenty years later. You know what? In the midst of all that stuff, he was dropping some signs. I don’t have time to let people check it out now. The people who get it, they get it. I think I speak clearly and hopefully lucidly enough that they get that.

But people in the academy are always suspicious of people who are able to speak beyond jargon, beyond obscure discourse and dialog and language, to say something meaningful in five minutes that somebody out there in the world can actually understand. I don’t apologize for that. I got a PhD from Princeton not to please other critics, but to speak the truth to power in as lucid a fashion as possible.

By the way, Dyson announced on the program that he was leaving his Syndication One weekday radio show.

The Way We (Struggle To) Live In New York City, Circa 2007

Got this from April Silver.

New York’s Affordable Housing Crisis

By Kevin Powell

Stacy had been subletting an apartment in an expansive complex on the Upper Westside of Manhattan from a family friend for ten-plus years. A product of working-class New York, this arrangement helped to give Stacy’s life a foundation and, for once, she was enjoying the fruits of the Big Apple experience. So you can imagine the shock and awe when Stacy, a single mother who scraped to make ends meet as she raised her son, received a notice from the management of her rent-stabilized building that she would have to vacate unless she were able to shell out $2400 a month in rent, a huge leap from the $900 she was currently paying. Terrified, confused, and sure she would wind up in a shelter or on the streets if she did not react quickly, Stacy, an administrative assistant by profession, sought and found a small apartment for her and her son in one of the most violent neighborhoods in Brooklyn. She is thinking of leaving New York City altogether because she feels trapped by her environment; and because over half of her income each year goes to rent. 

Imani is a modestly successful model who supplements her earnings by bartending at exclusive nightclubs. Financially astute, she has been saving her money to purchase a condo here in New York, her adopted hometown-the city Imani would prefer to live in rather than anywhere else in America. And why not? Imani is young, talented, energetic, intellectually curious, and she feels it is here that she can achieve her dreams as an actress, or whatever it is she so desires. But Imani is in crisis mode. For the past several months, the management company of the building where Imani rents (her cousin’s name is on the lease) has been harassing her about her residency, threatening to evict her, refusing to acknowledge that although she has been in this unit for two years, has written every single rent check, from her checking account, that somehow she is suddenly not eligible to rent that unit, with or without her name on the lease. Terrified and confused about the matter, Imani is being forced to go to court to fight for her apartment, and she has no idea what she will do if forced to vacate or pay a substantial rent increase if she wants to keep her living space.

Welcome to the terrordome called the struggle for affordable housing in New York City, circa the early days of the 21st century. I have been living in New York, mostly in Brooklyn, for 17 years and I have heard variations on the stories cited above multiple times, from renters and subletters alike, from New Yorkers of all ethnicities and cultures, all religions and faiths, all educational levels and occupations. Clearly, there is something rotten in Gotham, and it is the fact that millions of New Yorkers, quite literally, cannot afford a place to live. I knew it was a problem as I watched a parade of folks come and go in my neighborhood, in my borough, in my city, the past several years. I knew it was a problem with the loss of massive housing developments like Stuyvesant Town. I knew it was a problem with the recent threat to Starrett City as a mixed income and culturally diverse experiment in affordable housing in New York. There at Starrett City a developer attempted-and failed-to purchase it for a billion dollars or so, with the intention of creating top-dollar luxury apartments on the development’s vacant land. And God only knows what he and his partners planned to do with the tenants already inhabiting the previously built towers. We who are honest know the deal: New York City is propelled by and on the backs of working class and middle class New Yorkers of all persuasions. That was the case in 17th century New Amsterdam, the original name; and that is the case today at this critical juncture in our city’s history. I moved to this great metropolis, from across the river in Jersey City, because I wanted to be in a space where, as a writer and an activist, I could encounter the myriad of people, social classes, sights, sounds, languages, cultures, foods, and attitudes as I could no where else. And I moved here because I knew that in spite of all its big-city problems, that New York is the one place in America where you could walk half a block, turn a corner, go one subway stop, and, without question, feel the heartbeat of what former Mayor David Dinkins called “a gorgeous mosaic” at any given moment. 

But that New York City is being threatened by what could potentially be our worst housing crisis in decades. Like Stacy, more than two million New Yorkers pay over half their income in rent. In just three years (2002 to 2005), the city’s subsidized affordable housing shrunk by 11%. We know that state and federal initiatives like Mitchell-Lama, Section 8, and public housing were specifically created to serve and protect low to moderate-income urban dwellers. And we know that tens of thousands of Mitchell-Lama and Section 8 apartments have been lost; and there lingers a loaded and uncomfortable question about the future of public housing in New York.   

So we have a battle on our hands. We have to ask ourselves what kind of New York do we envision 10 years from now, or by, say, 2030, as Mayor Mike Bloomberg has instructed us to do? Is it a New York City where all New Yorkers can continue to live and coexist to make this metropolis the most magical, the most multicultural, the most multidimensional, and the most multilingual on this planet? Or are we going to sit idly by as New York becomes an oasis mainly for those able to rent or sublease at or above today’s market value for an apartment?

Stacy has already lost her apartment, and Imani may as well. But concerned New Yorkers can help turn the tide in the fight for affordable housing by pressing newly-elected Governor Spitzer to reverse the destructive practices put forth during the Pataki administration which favor landlords over tenants. This means repealing “vacancy decontrol,” preventing displacing rent increases, extending rent regulations to all developments, preserving state-built affordable housing, and enacting legislation that gives tenants and tenant-selected qualified buyers a right of first refusal to purchase buildings put on the market. This means that while we applaud Mayor Bloomberg’s plans to create 94,000 new affordable housing units, and to preserve 71,000 existing ones, we also must move to maintain the nearly 1.5 million housing units at risk if local and state elected officials do not act immediately. This means, too, supporting the efforts of key organizations like the Working Families Party and Housing Here and Now, who are spearheading this latest charge for affordable housing in New York.

And, for sure, it means some of us will have to burrow into our souls and ask ourselves what New York City, our city, will look like if all affordable housing, and its occupants, were slowly but surely to disappear in the coming years and decades?

Kevin Powell, a community organizer and writer based in Brooklyn, New York, is the author of 7 books, including his most recent essay collection, Someday We’ll All Be Free (Soft Skull Press) . He can be reached at kepo1@aol.com .

To learn more about the New York City affordable housing crisis, and to get involved, please visit these websites:

Working Families Party

Housing Here and Now