Imus Epilogue

 

Was that an actual flash of anger I saw in Gwen Ifill’s eyes last night? Did I hear a momentary change in tone as she delivered her commentary at the end of PBS’ “Washington Week”?

Well, it’s ABOUT. DAMN. TIME, GWEN.

My great peeve about Black MSM pundits is a simple one. When they criticize whites who diss them every day in one form or another, it’s gotta be “objective” criticism. When they criticize Blacks—especially the now-aging Dashiki Class after the latter calls them Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimas—they actually return fire like honest-to-gosh opinion writers, not worried at all about offending the targets or those they claim to represent. Guess it’s because the former actually represent REAL power, including the power to get their Black asses canned and rushing to Kinko’s to photocopy their HBCU News Writing syllabi. 🙂

Which is what made Ifill’s slight inflection so interesting. The Mask slipped off a little. Instead of doing what she’s made into an art form—showing the White Boys She Can Play Their Game As Well Or Better, etc.—she actually stepped outside of her smiling Washington insider posture and showed her audience that she was not happy. Not with Imus, and not with her enabling colleagues. She even quoted from her New York Times Op-Ed, which defended the honor of her sisters. Wow…….  🙂

Yeah, Gwen, put ’em on notice: There is no Stork Club anymore! LOL!  And just one more thing: Show that tone again sometime, PLEASE???

(JULY 15 ADDENDUM: Man, she’s called even more people out today on “Meet The Press”, including host Russert! I really hope to see more of this Gwen Ifill in the future.)

Meanwhile, on “Inside Washington,” Newsweek‘s Evan Thomas—who I KNOW got at least one email this past week asking not to appear on Imus’ show—just told the truth: he was on there to sell books, so he ignored all of Imus’ antics. He sounded sad—the way white liberals always do when they are (a)shamed and have to acknowledge white privledge of any amount. Since he defended Imus in the email response he sent back, this remorse just makes him, in this instance, just another Powerful White Boy who’s full of……..

Finally, speaking of white boys, Howard Kurtz is supposed to devote the whole hour of tomorrow’s “Reliable Sources” to the I-Mess. A media critic friend pointed out to me that Kurtz ignored the topic last Sunday. So There Ya Go. 🙂

CODA: As usual, “On The Media” is strong. But I’m not surprised; as a regular listener, I know Brooke and Bob never seem to care who they offend. I guess that shows that either they’re deep in The Club that Mike Wallace talked about with Brooke, or they really don’t care about being celebrity authors or television pundits.

Imus, Part XII: So Now That's It All Over……..

 

…….we can all move on. Good to see that Blacks can still organize when they make it a priority.

———————————–

The MSM consensus is that it was female and/or people of color corporate insiders who ulitmately pushed TPTB to push Imus out the door, not protests by Al Sharpton and others. If so, I heartily congratulate the corporate insiders.

I’ve been hard on NABJ for not calling for an advertising boycott. But, credit must be given: NABJ led the way in calling for his ouster.

In fact, Newsweek, in a press release announcing its Imus cover package, gave NABJ mucho activist cred:

Young black journalists were among the first to demand that Imus be ousted. Thursday evening, one day after Imus’s comments, Jemele Hill, an ESPN reporter, posted the Media Matters link on the National Association of Black Journalists’ e-mail list. Greg Lee, a Boston Globe reporter, spotted it right away. “I couldn’t believe Imus would pick on people he had no right to pick on,” he tells Newsweek. Lee forwarded the story to other online forums. In a matter of hours, black journalists in newsrooms across the country were clicking on it, and getting angry. The next day, the NABJ demanded an apology from Imus, then called for him to be fired.

Newsweek reports that after the networks suspended Imus, inside NBC, rank and file employees and reporters were growing impatient with what they considered foot-dragging. NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker heard from a subordinate about the growing uproar in NBC News, especially among black journalists, and knew immediately it was “obviously a huge problem and completely unacceptable,” according to two people familiar with his thinking who did not want to be named discussing their boss.

But the higher-ups still didn’t understand just how big a problem they had, until complaints started rolling in from employees all over the company, USA Network and Telemundo, the film group in Hollywood, and NBC-owned-and-operated local stations around the country.

NBC News president Steve Capus called for an extraordinary meeting of African-American employees on Tuesday, April 10. According to people who attended the meeting, but didn’t want to be named discussing internal matters, weatherman Al Roker told Capus, “That could have been my daughter Imus was joking about.” Others piled on. “I’m telling you, Capus got lobbied hard, really hard, and he really took it to heart,” says an NBC News senior producer. “We went out and created diversity in our newsrooms and we empowered employees to say what they think. And they’re telling us. It’s good for us and it’s good for the country.”

In my view, NABJ took a weak stance, since it had no teeth behind it, but it was leading.

Anyway, not too much sour grapes. If the advertising exodus coupled with the employee revolt is how this job got done, then so be it.

(On Sunday’s [April 15th] “Reliable Sources” special on the I-Mess, Ana Marie Cox goes into the Quip Hall of Fame: “It’s wasn’t Al Sharpton that got Imus fired, but Al Roker.”)

I’m just sad, because I believe we could easily get rid of all of the people who attack us daily if we weren’t always worried about playing someone’s else game. But I’m a freelancer, so I get to say that.  🙂

R.I.P., Roscoe Lee Browne, 81

 

I had the honor of seeing him on Broadway in the August Wilson play “Two Trains Running.” But to me, he will always be the voice of The Kingpin, the mob boss who was the main villain on the 1990s FOX Kids “Spider-Man: The Animated Series.” 🙂

I even talked to him once, over the phone. Old School Personified. Class Act. Very Dignfied.

Imus, Part XI: Invisible Women? A Black Woman's Response To Don Imus' Most Recent Sexist-Racist Remarks

 

From April Silver, by April Silver.

Invisible Women?

A Black Woman’s Response to Don Imus Most Recent Sexist-Racist Remarks

By April R. Silver

(April 9, 2007)  The recent media frenzy around national radio and talk show host Don Imus’ sexist-racist comments about the women’s basketball team at Rutgers University (New Brunswick) is one more item in the evidence column of how women are regarded by men. With a natural fluidity, Imus casually referred to the Rutgers players as nappy-headed hos.

Two days later (Friday, April 5), he read a statement that was supposed to be an apology. Today, he extended his apology by saying “I’m a good person. I said a bad thing.” 

When I first read the news, “What the hell…?” was all I could muster. Blood rushed. My heart ached and I lamented for Black women. Then I went back to doing what I was doing. It was surreal to not be surprised or outraged by his comments, but I wasn’t. From what I know about Imus, which is not much, he’s a veteran offender of everybody (except White men, I suppose). That men, be they Black or White, see women through idealized or dehumanized lenses, is not new. That Imus, in particular, would make ignorant comments, is status quo. So “shock jocks” are not shocking any longer. 

Perhaps the hardening began as I was growing up in Los Angeles in the 1980’s. LAPD’s death grip of choice for Black people was the choke-hold. That was one of my first understandings that some white people with authority had it in for Black people. And some non-authorative white people too! In 1998, James Byrd of Jasper, Texas was murdered by three racist white men. They hitched him to the back of their truck and dragged him for 3 miles. It’s believed that Byrd was alive for some of the time he was being dragged. A fast forward to recent times would bypass countless other racist murders and hate crimes, but it would bring one up to speed with Michael Richards’ rant about niggas at the Laugh Factory, as well as the NYPD murder of Sean Bell in New York, among other maddening things in this so-called civilized society. 

No doubt my hardening is also cemented by the current all-time high sexist state of affairs of today’s hip hop. Grown Black men, aided by white affluent male financiers, over-saturate our multi-media landscapes with sex, sex, and more mega sex fantasies – which do an excellent job of animalizing women or only presenting them, as Dr. Beverly Guy-Sheftall so eloquently states in Byron Hurt’s groundbreaking documentary “Hip Hop: Beyond Beats and Rhymes,”  as “objects to be fucked.” 

  

But Black sexist men, whether they care to admit it or not, take their cues from White sexist men. They reinforce each other and form unspoken alliances – all at our expense. But oppressed anybodies take their cues from dominating forces. It’s universal, scientific, and is part of the reason why women accommodate injustices from men.

Some Good Men

“If men had to go through what ya’ll go through today, the movement would have been started a long time ago. We couldn’t endure all that you put up with.” A male friend’s comments one afternoon as we discussed a few sacrifices that women make in order to please men. Our rituals around hair, make up, and body, mostly, not exclusively, have their origins in our desire to indulge men. Another friend, who is also regarded as an anti-sexist male, told me that his activist work is largely inspired by a woman in his life who was killed at the hands of an abusive husband. “When I first started challenging men about our sexist behavior, I was very nervous.” He confided. “I never knew what I was going to say, let alone how it was going to be received. But I would conjure up Tara (not the woman’s real name) and she would “talk” to me. She would guide me in taking up her cause. I felt like I was defending her and other abused women. I was glad to do it and I became less and less nervous over time.” I know plenty men who understand that the discussions about gender must involve men. I’m baffled that I know many men wise enough to stand this ground. They are a rare breed and I don’t exactly how they arrived at this place in their lives so securely…there’s nothing in our society that nurtures such thinking.

   

The thinking that gets upheld in this country is the normal Imus, he and his bashing kind—Black and White (Howard Stern, Star, formerly of Hot 97 and Power 105 in New York and others). More often than not, these men get rewarded by default. Their sexist-racist views are not eradicated, but are suspended, as if in mid-air, for the world to behold and publicly criticize…for a time. They have jobs to come back to…somewhere in the entertainment field, no matter how irresponsible and violating the comments. So cozy is the old-boy network, Imus doesn’t have to pause from his job right away…even his suspension is held in suspension. There have been meetings, marches, and mea culpas for a few days now. Imus’ firing has been called for by Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton, Brian Monroe, president of the National Association of Black Journalists, and many others. Despite my hardening to these sex-race fests that pop up on the national scene every few months, I am still jolted by a glaring factor. 

The Mule of the World

The exclusion of Black women weighing in on this controversy is thunderous. In the immediate aftermath of the comment, I never got the impression that “the media” was even remotely interested in feedback from the young Black women hit, or from any other Black woman for that matter. The respondent faces of this controversy have been predominately male. In fact, the one woman who was given a national platform this night on CNN’s Paula Zahn was a white woman — an enlightened, well-spoken, and progressive one — but a white woman nonetheless.

The by-passing of Black women is the kind of obnoxious, oppressive exclusion that “the media,” and the white affluent men who own it, have embraced for decades. Black women don’t immediately come to mind in the search for analysts or independent thinkers, even when the subject is them. Black woman organizations are not who Imus sat down with when he offered a so-called apology. He bowed toward men first. Rev. Sharpton is the logical go-to person in a national controversy such as this, for he has consistently stood up for the disenfranchised. It is not logical or acceptable, however, that Imus by-passed the women of the Rutgers basketball team and Black women leaders in making his first, second, and subsequent statements about the matter. Another item in the evidence column that Black women can be the ‘ho, the bitch, or even the reason for the gathering, but we are not to be engaged intelligently. It is not even assumed, by the so-called powers that be, that we can think, speak, or defend ourselves. If we take a stance at all, it must be after the men do their bidding.

Zora Neale Hurston’s Nanny (of Their Eyes Are Watching God) said that the Black woman is the mule of the world. That would be an ascent in some eyes.Amongst Black women, perhaps even we assume that White men just have too much power for our own good. Perhaps we also assume that if our transgressors are Black men, then well…maybe there’s no dignity or progress to be made if we dare challenge them. That’s just too disloyal. I disagree.

There is a time, a place, and the power of reason to stand up for ourselves, even amongst family. Part of my work, ironically, is in the media field (and, up until two months ago, I co-hosted an African American talk show on a prominent national cable TV show). In my work, I have come across narrow-minded decision-makers whose job it is to book commentators in the media. They often whine that in situations like this, they don’t have enough Black women resources to pull from. A lazy person’s out.

There is a solid body of work (be it literary, media, programming, or activist works) by highly intelligent African American women who have been doing anti-sexist work on the ground level for decades: Sister Souljah, Monfia Bandele-Akinwole, Erica Ford, Yvonne Bynoe, Joan Morgan, Farai Chideya, Toni Blackman, Rha Goddess, and countless others across the country – some known, some not. Either way, there is a deep-rooted knowing of injustices that only Black women, regardless of their station in life, can properly articulate.    

To Black Women 

When she reached adulthood, an enslaved African named Isabella Baumfree changed her name and identity to the one we know today: Sojourner Truth.

When Harriet Tubman fully grasped an understanding of the world she lived in, she mapped out her own survival, that for her family, and for her larger community. Both women, and others like them, were keenly aware of their unique skills, talents, and missions in life. They were self-permitted to think, organize, speak, and lead. The weight of racism and sexism was ever present, but not immobilizing. When they weren’t invited to help solve or speak about the problems of the day, they crashed the party. More importantly, they were not only pro-active in standing for their right to be free and live well, but for that of their communities too. Tubman, for example, was one of the first social entrepreneurs in our ancestral line. She owned 27 acres of land in upstate New York that she acquired for the hospital and other properties that she built for her family and her community.

Truth and Tubman are sacred models of woman leadership, a legacy of power that is our ancestral golden inheritance. Though from over a hundred years ago, their examples are eerily relevant today. 

Fast forward: modern models of leadership range from Camille Yarbrough to Sonia Sanchez to Fannie Lou Hamer to Shirley Chisholm to Afeni Shakur and countless others. Our models also include the millions of unrecognized Black women in this country alone who have made a hard decision to combat hate—from within and without. So we need not dig so deeply into our bloodline to be encouraged and empowered, but we need to pull from something…and now! If you are a writer, write on our behalf. Let some of your stories be about helping us heal from this often loveless world. Or heal…with us in mind. Dance with us, sing about us…more. If you are a mother, nurture and discipline the children with our longevity at heart. And if you are without a means to support yourself at this time, or without a loving partner to ease the burdens of the day, keep pushing anyway. Never mind about finding fault, find another way, as my mother says. In every single aspect of our lives, we must be self-permitted to tell the truth about our lives and stories that shape them.

Somebody, quite naturally, is going to be offended in the process. Invariably, someone is going to tell us how wrong we are, but that’s not anyone’s call to make but ours. And I strongly believe that we should partner with Black men, especially, but with anyone else who stands in principle support. But the battle for the respect of Black women, however, is ours to lead.

© 2007, April R. Silver

 

Here’s a simple but powerful reaction in the midst of this Imus whirlwind. Write and call… 

General Manager

WFAN-AM

34-12 36th Street

Astoria, NY 11106

718.706.7690

“Central to the success of the station is legendary morning man Don Imus. The Imus in the Morning program is now syndicated to over 90 stations across the United States with an audience in excess of 10 million. It has become a regular stop on the circuit for Washington insiders, the liberal media elite, best-selling authors and the occasional presidential candidate. In September of 1996, MSNBC, the cable/Internet venture of Microsoft and NBC, began a simulcast of the Imus in the Morning show for their own morning programming.”

 –Excerpt from wfan.com 

CBS Radio (owns WFAN)

1515 Broadway

New York, NY
10036

212.846.3939 

MSNBC TV (airs Imus’ show)

One MSNBC Plaza

Secaucus, N.J. 07094

More importantly, a first step toward enlightenment on issues of sex and race— related to and from the minds and souls of Black women—is reading up on Black women writers:  

Angela Davis

Audre Lorde

bell hooks

Beverly Guy-Sheftall

Joan Morgan

Johnnetta Betsch Cole

Lori S. Robinson

Sister Souljah

Sonia Sanchez 

Imus, Part X: Don Imus, Race And Sex In America

Just got this from April Silver this morning.

Don Imus, Race, and Sex in America
By Kevin Powell

I attended Rutgers University in the 1980s, I am a native of Jersey City, and I’ve always been proud of any accomplishments that have come from that state. So you can imagine my pride as the school’s women’s basketball team made its march through the recent NCAA tournament. Proud because Rutgers’ coach, C. Vivian Stringer, one of the sport’s great mentors, has had so many tragedies in her life, yet she has withstood them with grace, dignity, and a complete dedication to these young women, all underclass students. Proud because I noted the backgrounds of RU’s players (the majority of them African American), many of them from inner city environments similar to mine; yet they had managed to avoid those minefields and had become, with their brilliant run to the championship game against the mighty University of Tennessee, an example for women and girls nationwide. Focus and persevere, their play seem to say, and you can achieve anything.

Yes, I was disappointed that the Lady Knights lost to Tennessee. But far more disappointing was radio personality Don Imus’ “nappy-headed hos” remark the next day, Wednesday, April 4th-coincidentally the 39th anniversary of the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He and his producer, Bernard McGuirk, engaged in the following exchange:

Imus: “That’s some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos…”

“Some hardcore hos,” McGuirk quipped. “That’s some nappy-headed hos there, I’m going to tell you that,” Imus added.

We know we live in a world of shock value humor and media commentary. We know that terms like “civility” have long gone the way of short basketball shorts. But there comes a time when an individual or an institution crosses the line, and that is precisely what Mr. Imus did. And no matter how much he apologizes, proclaims that he is “a good man,” details his charitable efforts that include African American children, what cannot be ignored, nor erased, is the fact that his views are typical of American males who continue to view women, and particularly Black women, as objects to be mocked, scorned, and beaten down, even when they do good, as the RU women clearly had done. This is nothing new, unfortunately. America has a long and terrible history, dating back to slavery, of disrespecting, degrading, and disregarding Black women. Of reducing Black women to sexual favor, to cook, cleaner (recall that Mr. Imus once referred to renowned Black journalist Gwen Ifill as “the cleaning lady” as she covered the White House), mammy, anything, really, except as whole human beings, as whole women. Little wonder, then, right into the twenty-first century, that we still have millions of Black American women and girls who feel inadequate, less than, who battle with identity issues, because this country’s standard of beauty often does not include their body types, their skin colors, their hair textures. Mr. Imus’ dis is not some mere isolated incident. It is part of the American racial sickness that habitually views Black women and girls as unattractive, as ugly.

Add to this reality the present-day fact that mainstream corporate conglomerates have signed off on a popular culture-namely the hiphop industry-which has, for at least the past decade and a half, and without fail, portrayed Black and other women of color as vixens, strippers, and, yes, “hos.” Where do we think Mr. Imus got the term, if not from the vernacular of our times, put forth via record labels, radio stations, and video networks, and, yes, from far too many ignorant Black male hiphoppers, to describe women? Thus what we have is the crash collision of racism and sexism in the person of Don Imus.

Now, is Don Imus the problem by himself? Of course not, which is why I think calls for his dismissal are rooted purely in emotionalism and miss the larger issues here. Bigger problem number one is a federal government and a corporate hierarchy that have allowed destructive and despicable images and words regarding women to be transmitted, without any real regulation, for far too long, to the point where someone like Don Imus believes it okay to refer to women as “hos” on a nationally syndicated radio show heard by millions. Bigger problem number two is the American society we’ve become where, for the sake of profit and audience size, personalities, commentators, and pundits are allowed to spew all manner of hateful rhetoric, even as such language unwittingly reinforces negative stereotypes, perpetuates individual and mass bigotry, and wounds the self-esteem of the targeted recipients.

Imagine, for a moment, what those young ladies at Rutgers University must be feeling right about now. They lost the championship on national television, and then, the very next day, they are referred to as “hos” on national television and national radio. These are young women, in the formative stages of their lives, in a world, as I am sure Coach Stringer has told them time and again, which is already aligned against women in so many ways. You are a teenager, early twenties, at the most, and you have already been referred to as “hos” by a very powerful man with three-decades plus in the media. What do they have to look forward to from us men, regardless of what we do or say we are about, if this is as good as it gets? Sexism, clearly, knows no bounds and takes no prisoners.

Do I believe in freedom of speech? No doubt. Do I believe in irresponsible speech, regardless of the context, that could bring serious injury to others? No, I do not, not any longer, because I’ve certainly been on both sides in my own life journey. It is not right to project hate and abuse toward others, nor is it fair to be on the receiving end of it, either.

So where do we go from here? Don Imus should be fired. If he is not fired, he should be suspended for six months, not the two-week vacation he has been given by both CBS and NBC. That is a slap on the wrist and a disingenuous way of saying “We hope this blows over soon.” Mr. Imus needs to understand, during that real suspension, that there is a difference between charity and justice. What he does for children with cancer, including those Black ones he keeps mentioning, is charity. Justice means he understands in his bones that his actions and words have got to be consistent, otherwise all that wonderful work he and his wife do are for naught.

Next, CBS and NBC, Mr. Imus’ employers, should each make a significant donation to Rutgers in support of a program selected by the women’s basketball team, which means it wouldn’t be limited to an athletic thing. And CBS and NBC should each immediately hire Blacks and other people of color and women as hosts or lead hosts for programming that parallels Mr. Imus’ time slot in terms of importance, because we cannot ignore the on going problem of diversity, or the lack of it, in mainstream American media. Moreover, Mr. Imus’ termination or suspension should constitute a two-strikes-you’re-out policy regarding such vile remarks going forward for all radio personalities. In other words, the Federal Communications Commission needs to start doing its job, better, on all fronts and in protection of all Americans. If it could come after Janet Jackson and CBS for the infamous Super Bowl “wardrobe malfunction,” then it should be monitoring and penalizing all radio speech, all television images, that can really hurt people in some way. Again, justice needs to be about consistency.

At the end of the day, this is not about political correctness. Nor is this about eliminating freedom of speech. We want diverse views and we want our humor, our commentary, and, yes, our rants. We are simply sick and tired of American humor, commentary, and rants that do not foster real dialogue, real thought, and that, when all is said and done, burn and destroy more bridges than they build.

Kevin Powell is a writer, public speaker, activist and author of 7 books, including SOMEDAY WE’LL ALL BE FREE (Soft Skull Press). He is based in Brooklyn, New York and can be reached at kevin@kevinpowell.net .

Imus, Part VII: Bruce Would Set Him Loose

Wow! I just finished watching Bruce Gordon hold down the Fort………………………

 

……………………….for CBS (!), explaining to CNN’s Fredricka Whitfield how complicated it is to fire Imus!!!

(Really, Bruce? Is his contract that tight???? Does he make that much money for CBS? Day-am!  🙂 )

Gordon, former president of the National NAACP, is a member of the network’s board of directors.

“I applaud CBS for being thoughtful,” he said, weaving  like Ali in his prime.

(“Thoughtful???” Really, Bruce? LOL!)

He did say if he owned CBS, Imus would be out on his cowboy hat. “It is more difficult for managers to weigh all the factors.”

(“Factors”……Hmmm……that means money, right?  🙂 )

Wow……Imus must really be in trouble if his “boys” don’t even have his back.  🙂